Literature DB >> 18021014

A note on problem difficulty measures in black-box optimization: classification, realizations and predictability.

Jun He1, Colin Reeves, Carsten Witt, Xin Yao.   

Abstract

Various methods have been defined to measure the hardness of a fitness function for evolutionary algorithms and other black-box heuristics. Examples include fitness landscape analysis, epistasis, fitness-distance correlations etc., all of which are relatively easy to describe. However, they do not always correctly specify the hardness of the function. Some measures are easy to implement, others are more intuitive and hard to formalize. This paper rigorously defines difficulty measures in black-box optimization and proposes a classification. Different types of realizations of such measures are studied, namely exact and approximate ones. For both types of realizations, it is proven that predictive versions that run in polynomial time in general do not exist unless certain complexity-theoretical assumptions are wrong.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18021014     DOI: 10.1162/evco.2007.15.4.435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Comput        ISSN: 1063-6560            Impact factor:   3.277


  1 in total

1.  Scientific Networks on Data Landscapes: Question Difficulty, Epistemic Success, and Convergence.

Authors:  Patrick Grim; Daniel J Singer; Steven Fisher; Aaron Bramson; William J Berger; Christopher Reade; Carissa Flocken; Adam Sales
Journal:  Episteme (Edinb)       Date:  2013-12-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.