Literature DB >> 18020802

Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale.

Julia Levashina1, Michael A Campion.   

Abstract

An Interview Faking Behavior (IFB) scale is developed and validated in 6 studies (N = 1,346). In Study 1, a taxonomy of faking behavior is delineated. The factor structure of a measure is evaluated and refined (Studies 2 and 3). The convergent and discriminant validity of the measure is examined (Study 4). The IFB scale consists of 4 factors (Slight Image Creation, Extensive Image Creation, Image Protection, and Ingratiation) and 11 subfactors (Embellishing, Tailoring, Fit Enhancing, Constructing, Inventing, Borrowing, Masking, Distancing, Omitting, Conforming, and Interviewer Enhancing). A study of actual interviews shows that scores on the IFB scale are related to getting a 2nd interview or a job offer (Study 5). In Study 6, an experiment is conducted to test the usefulness of the new measure for studying methods of reducing faking using structured interviews. It is found that past behavior questions are more resistant to faking than situational questions, and follow-up questioning increases faking. Finally, over 90% of undergraduate job candidates fake during employment interviews; however, fewer candidates engage in faking that is semantically closer to lying, ranging from 28% to 75%. (c) 2007 APA

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18020802     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  8 in total

1.  To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.

Authors:  Stephanie J Law; Joshua Bourdage; Thomas A O'Neill
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-15

2.  Editorial: Impression Management and Faking in Job Interviews.

Authors:  Joshua S Bourdage; Nicolas Roulin; Julia Levashina
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-28

3.  Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.

Authors:  Annika Wilhelmy; Martin Kleinmann; Klaus G Melchers; Martin Götz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-29

4.  Individual Difference Variables and the Occurrence and Effectiveness of Faking Behavior in Interviews.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Buehl; Klaus G Melchers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-10

5.  Impression Management and Interview and Job Performance Ratings: A Meta-Analysis of Research Design with Tactics in Mind.

Authors:  Jessica A Peck; Julia Levashina
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-15

6.  Once an Impression Manager, Always an Impression Manager? Antecedents of Honest and Deceptive Impression Management Use and Variability across Multiple Job Interviews.

Authors:  Nicolas Roulin; Joshua S Bourdage
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-24

7.  Do I just look stressed or am I stressed? Work-related stress in a sample of Italian employees.

Authors:  Gabriele Giorgi; Jose M Leon-Perez; Vincenzo Cupelli; Nicola Mucci; Giulio Arcangeli
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.179

8.  Shake and Fake: the Role of Interview Anxiety in Deceptive Impression Management.

Authors:  Deborah M Powell; Joshua S Bourdage; Silvia Bonaccio
Journal:  J Bus Psychol       Date:  2020-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.