Angiogenesis is an important process in cancer growth and metastasis. During the tumor angiogenic process, endothelial cells express various cell surface receptors which can be utilized for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. One such protein receptor of interest is the integrin alphav beta3. Our group is involved in the development of molecular imaging probes and drug delivery systems targeting alphav beta3. Based on extensive lead optimization study with the integrin antagonist compounds, we have developed a new generation of integrin alphav beta3 compound (IA) which has superior binding affinity to alphav beta3. Utilizing this IA as a targeting agent, we have developed a novel integrin-targeted nanoparticle (ITNP) system for targ alphav beta3 was observed. These ITNPs also were rapidly taken up by cells that express alphav beta3. The ITNPs accumulated in the angiogenic vessels, after systemic administration in a murine squamous cell carcinoma model. This novel intergrin targeted ITNP platform will likely have an application in targeted delivery of drugs and genes in vivo and can also be used for molecular imaging.
Angiogenesis is an important process in cancer growth and metastasis. During the tumor angiogenic process, endothelial cells express various cell surface receptors which can be utilized for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. One such protein receptor of interest is the integrin alphav beta3. Our group is involved in the development of molecular imaging probes and drug delivery systems targeting alphav beta3. Based on extensive lead optimization study with the integrin antagonist compounds, we have developed a new generation of integrin alphav beta3 compound (IA) which has superior binding affinity to alphav beta3. Utilizing this IA as a targeting agent, we have developed a novel integrin-targeted nanoparticle (ITNP) system for targ alphav beta3 was observed. These ITNPs also were rapidly taken up by cells that express alphav beta3. The ITNPs accumulated in the angiogenic vessels, after systemic administration in a murinesquamous cell carcinoma model. This novel intergrin targeted ITNP platform will likely have an application in targeted delivery of drugs and genes in vivo and can also be used for molecular imaging.
Angiogenesis is required for cancer growth and is highly associated with cancer metastasis. Integrin αvβ3 is a cell-surface receptor protein that is upregulated in various pathological conditions including osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, macular degeneration as well as cancer angiogenesis (Eliceiri and Cheresh 2000; Ruoslahti 2002). Integrin αvβ3 is a widely recognized target for the development of molecular probes for imaging angiogenesis and for cancer therapy. Integrin αvβ3 antagonists induce apoptosis on activated endothelial cells and also αvβ3 positive tumor cells (Taga et al 2002). Vitaxin, an antibody for αvβ3 and cilengitide, a cyclic peptide (Tucker 2006) both block αvβ3 and are in clinical trials as antiangiogenic agents in patients with various tumors (Gutheil et al 2000; Raguse et al 2004). A number of research groups have developed αvβ3 targeted nanomaterials for imaging and therapy (Winter et al 2003; Lim et al 2006). A paramagnetic polymerized liposomal nanoparticle was developed by attaching the αvβ3 antibody LM609 onto the surface of the nanoparticle (Storrs et al 1995), and this polymerized nanoparticle showed good tumor accumulation in the VX2 rabbittumor model (Sipkins et al 1998). Similar targeted polymerized liposomes have also been developed for targeted gene delivery, in which the targeting agent is a small molecule integrin antagonist instead of an antibody (Hood et al 2002). These particles also demonstrated angiogenesis targeting in murinetumor models. We have developed a novel integrin antagonist which has more than 20 times better binding affinity to αvβ3 compared to the one that was used by Hood et al (Duggan et al 2000; Burnett et al 2005). Here we report a novel ITNP system that has this high affinity integrin antagonist compound as the targeting agent and the subsequent studies involving the in vivo tumor angiogenesis targeting.
Methods and materials
Synthesis of targeting lipid BisT-PE-EDTA-IA (Scheme 1)
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dianhydride (EDTA-dianhydride, 135 mg, 525 μ moles) was dissolved in a dry 3-neck flask, under a positive pressure of argon, in pyridine (20 mL). To this solution was added 1,2-bis(10,12-tricosadiynoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (436 mg, 500 μmoles) in methylene chloride (5 mL) drop wise using a syringe pump at the rate of 2.5 mL per hour. The starting material had completely disappeared after two hours stirring, as observed by thin layer chromatography. To this reaction was added the integrin antagonist compound (271mg, 550 μmoles) and allowed to stir for 72 hours. The reaction mixture was partitioned between methylene chloride (100 mL) and water (20 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with brine (10 mL) and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution was filtered to remove sodium sulfate and the solvent was then removed by spin evaporation and the residue was dried under high vacuum over night. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography using CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O/NH4OH (50/40/5/5) as the solvent to yield 102 mg of the desired product (yield = 13%). 1H NMR: (CDCl3:CD3OD 1:1, 300 MHz, δ ppm) 7.65 (2H, d, Ar-H), 6.75 (2H, d, Ar-H), 0.65–1.05 (116H, overlapping peaks, 2-CH3 54-CH2 and 2-CH), 0.8 (6H, s, CH3). MALDI-MS: M+H+ = 1585.842.
Synthesis of integrin-targeted nanoparticle (ITNP)
The ITNP consists of two lipids with encapsulated rhodamine-B (Figure 1). The first lipid is 1,2-bis(10,12-tricosadiynoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid-integrin antagonist (BisT-PE-EDTA-IA) and the second lipid is the base lipid 1,2-bis(10,12-tricosadiynoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (BisT-PC) lipid. The BisT-PC lipid was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. The BisT-PE-EDTA-IA was synthesized from commercially available BisT-PE lipid as described above. Targeting lipid (BisT-PE-EDTA-IA) and the base lipid (BisT-PC, Avanti lipids) were dissolved in a 1:1 mixture of chloroform and methanol and were spin-evaporated to make a thin film. The film was dried under high vacuum over night. This film was hydrated with 10 mM ammonium chloride solution and was gently mixed. The suspension was subjected to 5 consecutive freeze-thaw cycles followed by 5 extrusion cycles through a 100 nm pore size polycarbonate membrane. The extruded particles were then dialyzed against a solution of rhodamine-B for 2 hours. The rhodamine-B loaded ITNPs were then dialyzed against 10 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 for 3 hours. The dialyzed ITNPs were then filtered through 0.2 μ filter into a sterile vial. The size and zeta potential of the ITNPs were determined by dynamic light scattering. The fluorescence spectra was recorded for the rhodamine.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic diagram outlining the formation of the ITNPs by self-assembly of the appropriate lipids. The lipid with targeting agent (10 mole%) was combined with base lipid (90 mole%) in a solution of chloroform and methanol (1:1). The mean diameter of the ITNPs was 104.4 ± 3.3 nm, as determined by dynamic light scattering, and the zeta potential was approximately −43.8 mv. The ITNPs were stable for weeks without any observable changes in their physical and biological properties when formulated for use in vivo. (b) Schematic diagram outlining the formation of the Control-NPs by self-assembly of the appropriate lipids. The mean diameter of the nanoparticle was 101.2 ± 2.4 nm, as determined by dynamic light scattering, and the zeta potential was approximately −32.6 mv.
Synthesis of control-NP
The control-NP consists of two lipids with encapsulated rhodamine-B. BisT-PE and BisT-PC lipids (Avanti Polar lipids) were dissolved in a 1:1 mixture of chloroform and methanol and were spin-evaporated to make a thin film. The film was dried under high vacuum over night. This film was hydrated with 10 mM ammonium chloride solution and was gently mixed. The suspension was subjected to 5 consecutive freeze-thaw cycles followed by 5 extrusion cycles through a 100 nm pore size polycarbonate membrane. The extruded particles were then dialyzed against a solution of rhodamine-B for 2 hours. The rhodamine-B loaded NPs were then dialyzed against 10 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 for 3 hours. The dialyzed control-NPs were then filtered through 0.2 μ filter into a sterile vial. The size and zeta potential of the control-NPs were determined by dynamic light scattering.
Transmission electron microscopy of the ITNPs
20 μl of the ITNP was added onto a carbon coated Formvar-film grid. The excess solution was removed by blotting and to this was added 1% phosphotungstic acid solution, pH 7.0. Excess phosphotungstic acid was removed by blotting. The grid surface was then air dried at room temperature. The grid was examined by an electron microscope operated at 75 kV (Hitachi H7000, Tokyo). Digital images were taken by a charge-coupled device camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA).
Binding affinity assay
Purified integrin αvβ3 protein (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) was applied to 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates at 0.1 μg/well. After overnight incubation at 4 °C the plates were washed, and then blocked with milk solution (KPL, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) at room temperature for 2 h. The blocking buffer was removed, and the plates were inoculated in quadruplicate with ITNPs with a typical starting concentration of 1.25 μM. Serial dilutions were prepared in the 96-well plates using multichannel pipette. To each well was added biotinylated vitronectin solution (0.1 μg/well) as standard competitor. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 3 h, washed, and the bound vitronectin was detected using NeutrAvidin-HRP conjugate at 0.01 μg/well (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and LumiGlo chemiluminescent substrate system (KPL, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). The luminescence was read using a Wallac Counter. The concentration of inhibitor producing 50% inhibition (IC50) of vitronectin binding to αvβ3 was calculated based on a curve fitting model (Burnett et al 2005).
Cell uptake assay of the ITNPs
The M21 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Biofluids, Gaithersburg, MD) containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin (50 IU ml−1 and 50 μg ml−1, respectively, BioSource International; Rockville, MD) at 37 °C with 5% CO2, and were continuously maintained without over-confluences. Before the experiment, the cells were passaged at 60%–70% confluence two to three times and the cells were loaded to the glass culture chambers for the ITNPs cell uptake assay. Two hours before the cell tracking experiment cells were transferred into fresh medium to ensure the good condition of the cells. The ITNPs were added to the chamber yielding a final concentration of 12 μmol/ml in the presence of 10% fetal bovine serum culture medium for 5 min, 15 min, and 30 min separately to obtain time course of the uptake of ITNPs into the cells. At different time points, the cells in the culture chamber were washed and fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde-phosphate buffered saline for 20 minutes at RT. After fixing, the cells were washed again and counterstained with a solution of 4′-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and observed by the Fluorescence microscopy to obtain the cellular distribution of the ITNPs at different time points.
In vivo/ex vivo studies
A SCC 7, murinesquamous cell carcinoma model was used for the in vivo studies. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Biofluids, Gaithersburg, MD) containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin (50 IU ml−1 and 50 μg ml−1, respectively, BioSource International, Rockville, MD) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The cells were pre-tested as mycoplasm negative (Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Missouri, MO). Female C3H mice (6–9 weeks) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Gaithersburg, MD) to establish the squamous cell carcinomamouse model. All animal work was performed according to an approved animal protocol and in compliance with the NIH Clinical Center Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Prior to the implantation of the tumor cells, the mice flanks were shaved bilaterally and prepped with isopropyl alcohol. A suspension of SCC-7 cells (1 × 106 cells in 100 μl of PBS) was injected in each of the flanks of each mouse with a 27 G needle. On average, a tumor required 10 days to grow to half centimeter before the mice received the tail-vein injection of Rhodamine-B encapsulated ITNPs. Each mouse received 100 μl of the ITNPs, and after 2 hrs the animal was euthanized. However, 15 minutes before euthanization, the mouse was injected with fluorescein isothiocyante-lectin (FITC-lectin) by tail vein (Hunter et al 2006). The tumor was harvested for cryostat sections. The slides were counterstained with DAPI and the slides were examined with a Zeiss upright microscope using Rhodamine, FITC and DAPI filters to determine the biodistribution of the ITNPs within the cancerous tissues.
Results and discussion
Assembly of integrin-targeted ITNPs
For the construction of the integrin-targeted ITNPs, the critical step is the synthesis of targeting lipidBisT-PE-EDTA-IA as shown in Scheme 1. The IA was synthesized following previously published procedure (Burnett 2005). IA contains a primary amine functionality for the synthesis of the targeting lipid. EDTA-dianhydride has two reactive anhydrides and can be conjugated to two different amines one on each side by a single pot reaction. The IA and BisT-PE lipid each have one primary amine and by controlled reaction conditions we were able to conjugate them with EDTA-dianhydride. The crude product was purified by column chromatography. The product was characterized by NMR and mass spectrometry. The ITNPs consists of a targeting lipid and a base lipid. These two lipid solutions were mixed together and a film was made by evaporating the solvents. The film was hydrated and after few freeze-thaw cycles, the ITNPs were prepared by extrusion through a polycarbonate membrane. Rhodamine-B was encapsulated inside the particle by ion-exchange process. The particles were purified by dialysis and filtered through 0.2 μm filter into a sterile vial. The mean diameter of the ITNP was 104.4 ± 3.3 nm by dynamic light scattering, the pH was 7.40 and the zeta potential was −43.8 mV. An aliquot of the ITNPs when filtered through 10,000 MW cutoff spin filter, did not show any fluorescence in the filtrate indicating that rhodamine-B was stably encapsulated inside the ITNPs and did not leak out. The ITNPs were stained with phosphotungstic acid at pH 7.0 and examined with Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The ITNPs appeared as vesicles formed by a single large aqueous cavity surrounded by a thick membrane (Figure 2). The TEM also confirmed the size of ITNP was around 100 nm, in accordance with the measurement by dynamic light scattering.
Scheme 1
Schematic illustration for the chemical synthesis of targeting lipid (BisT-PE-EDTA-IA).
Figure 2
Transmission electron microscopic image of integrin targeted nanoparticles.
Binding affinity and cellular uptake of the ITNPs
The binding affinity of the targeted ITNPs to αvβ3 was tested by coating 96 well plates with αvβ3. This is a competitive inhibition assay, where the ability of the ITNPs to competitively inhibit the binding of vitronectin to αvβ3. We found that ITNPs showed excellent binding affinity to the integrin αvβ3 (9.2 nM) (Figure 3). The control nanoparticles did not bind to αvβ3 even at very high concentration in the integrin αvβ3 plate binding assay (data not shown) which is easy to understand that the bilayer lipids do not have a good binding affinity to the αvβ3 protein. Since we did not observe the binding affinity of non-targeted particles to the αvβ3 protein, therefore we specifically only observed ITNPs cell uptake and in vivo anagiogenesis targeting as following.
Figure 3
ITNPs binding affinity to the integrin α vβ 3 protein was quantified by the αvβ3 plate binding assay, as in method description. The concentration of inhibitor producing 50% inhibition (IC50) of vitronectin binding to αvβ3 was calculated based on a curve fitting model using KaleidaGraph 3.5 (Synergy Software, Reading, PA). ITNPs and targeting agent IA have a closed binding affinity to the αvβ3 protein.
Cell uptake of the ITNPs
When ITNPs were incubated with the M21 cells, it was observed that the ITNPs were accumulated in the cells within minutes and major presented in the cytoplasm of the M21 cells, as observed by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 4). This quick accumulation possibly happens by receptor mediated endocytosis. The uptake of the ITNPs was further investigated by live cell imaging and has been disclosed (Zhang et al 2006).
Figure 4
Cellular uptake of the ITNPs by M21 cells in vitro. The ITNPs were added to the chamber yielding a final concentration of 12 μmol/ml. After 5, 15, and 30 minutes of incubation, the cells were washed, stained with DAPI and observed by fluorescence microscopy.
Tumor angiogenesis targeting
The targeted ITNPs were tail vein injected into C3H mice bearing murinesquamous cell carcinoma (SCC-7) tumors to determine the in vivo ability to selectively target angiogenic vessels. Fifteen minutes prior to euthanasia, the animal was tail vein injected with FITC-lectin, which allowed us to observe the functional angiogenic vessels (Hunter 2006) and correlate with the distribution of the ITNPs in the functional angiogenic vessels. The ITNPs were visualized by fluorescence microscopy in the tumor angiogenic vessels which overlapped with the FITC-lectin signal, clearly demonstrating the angiogenesis specific targeting of these ITNPs (Figure 5). Some accumulation was also seen in various other tissues, such as liver and spleen and minimal accumulation was observed in the lung capillary vessels, which warrants further optimization of the ITNPs such as size, charge and lipid composition.
Figure 5
Angiogenic vessel targeting by the ITNPs. A: SCC-7 Cell nucleus stained by DAPI, B: Functional angiogenic vessels stained by injected FITC-Lectin, C: angiogenic vessels targeting by ITNPs observed by Rhodamine, D: Merge signals of the ITNPs targeted vessels and functional angiogenic vessels labeled by Lectin, E: Merge signals of the ITNPs targeted vessels, functional angiogenic vessels labeled by Lectin, and cell nuclear staining by DAPI. (scale bar = 50 um).
Conclusion
We have synthesized a novel integrin targeted rhodamine-B encapsulated ITNP. This ITNP binds to the integrin αvβ3 in the in vitro assay. In vivo the ITNP targets the tumor angio-genic vessels, specially localized within the endothelial cells. Further optimization of this ITNP is feasible by modifying the size, charge and lipid composition. Incorporation of a wide variety of payloads for multi-modality imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, Positron emission tomography and optical imaging) and/or therapy (cytotoxic agent, radionu-clide, and anti vascular agents) is in progress.
Authors: M E Duggan; L T Duong; J E Fisher; T G Hamill; W F Hoffman; J R Huff; N C Ihle; C T Leu; R M Nagy; J J Perkins; S B Rodan; G Wesolowski; D B Whitman; A E Zartman; G A Rodan; G D Hartman Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2000-10-05 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: J C Gutheil; T N Campbell; P R Pierce; J D Watkins; W D Huse; D J Bodkin; D A Cheresh Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Patrick M Winter; Anne M Morawski; Shelton D Caruthers; Ralph W Fuhrhop; Huiying Zhang; Todd A Williams; John S Allen; Elizabeth K Lacy; J David Robertson; Gregory M Lanza; Samuel A Wickline Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John D Hood; Mark Bednarski; Ricardo Frausto; Samira Guccione; Ralph A Reisfeld; Rong Xiang; David A Cheresh Journal: Science Date: 2002-06-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Hee Dong Han; Lingegowda S Mangala; Jeong Won Lee; Mian M K Shahzad; Hye Sun Kim; Deyu Shen; Eun Ji Nam; Edna M Mora; Rebecca L Stone; Chunhua Lu; Sun Joo Lee; Ju Won Roh; Alpa M Nick; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Anil K Sood Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eric M Bressler; Jayoung Kim; Ron B Shmueli; Adam C Mirando; Hojjat Bazzazi; Esak Lee; Aleksander S Popel; Niranjan B Pandey; Jordan J Green Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Richard P Baum; Harshad R Kulkarni; Dirk Müller; Stanley Satz; Narasimhan Danthi; Young-Seung Kim; Martin W Brechbiel Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Efstathios Karathanasis; Cissy M Geigerman; Charles A Parkos; Leslie Chan; Ravi V Bellamkonda; David L Jaye Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Ahmed M E Abdalla; Lin Xiao; Muhammad Wajid Ullah; Miao Yu; Chenxi Ouyang; Guang Yang Journal: Theranostics Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 11.556