UNLABELLED: Volatile anesthetics may interfere with pain perception. This study investigates the effect of halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane when applied locally, to the response of an electrical stimulus. METHODS: In this randomized control double-blind crossover study 70 volunteers were studied. In experiment 1 (30 subjects), equipotent liquid volumes of halothane 1 ml, isoflurane 1.5 ml and sevoflurane 2.7 ml were randomly applied on one forearm for 30 minutes. The other forearm received water. Both forearms were exposed to an electrical stimulus. The experiment was repeated the following day in a reverse fashion. In experiments 2 (20 subjects) and 3 (20 subjects) the response to the same stimulus was tested after local application of 2, 4, and 6 ml of halothane or 5 ml of sevoflurane respectively. RESULTS: Low doses of the three anesthetics were associated with an increased response to the electrical stimulus (F = 8.940, df = 1,174, P = 0.003). Higher doses of halothane and sevoflurane had no effect on the response (F = 2.358, df = 1,114, P = 0.127 and t = 0.840, df = 19, P = 0.411 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low liquid volumes of volatile anesthetics, when applied locally to the skin enhanced the response to an electrical stimulus but higher volumes had no effect.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Volatile anesthetics may interfere with pain perception. This study investigates the effect of halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane when applied locally, to the response of an electrical stimulus. METHODS: In this randomized control double-blind crossover study 70 volunteers were studied. In experiment 1 (30 subjects), equipotent liquid volumes of halothane 1 ml, isoflurane 1.5 ml and sevoflurane 2.7 ml were randomly applied on one forearm for 30 minutes. The other forearm received water. Both forearms were exposed to an electrical stimulus. The experiment was repeated the following day in a reverse fashion. In experiments 2 (20 subjects) and 3 (20 subjects) the response to the same stimulus was tested after local application of 2, 4, and 6 ml of halothane or 5 ml of sevoflurane respectively. RESULTS: Low doses of the three anesthetics were associated with an increased response to the electrical stimulus (F = 8.940, df = 1,174, P = 0.003). Higher doses of halothane and sevoflurane had no effect on the response (F = 2.358, df = 1,114, P = 0.127 and t = 0.840, df = 19, P = 0.411 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low liquid volumes of volatile anesthetics, when applied locally to the skin enhanced the response to an electrical stimulus but higher volumes had no effect.
Authors: Adrian Imbernon-Moya; Francisco Javier Ortiz-de Frutos; Mónica Sanjuan-Alvarez; Isabel Portero-Sanchez; Raúl Merinero-Palomares; Victoria Alcazar Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Mayank Aranke; Cynthia T Pham; Melis Yilmaz; Jason K Wang; Vwaire Orhurhu; Daniel An; Elyse M Cornett; Alan David Kaye; Anh L Ngo; Farnad Imani; Reza Farahmand Rad; Giustino Varrassi; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits Journal: Anesth Pain Med Date: 2021-02-24