Literature DB >> 1801267

Magnetic resonance imaging study on spinal cord plasticity in patients with cervical compression myelopathy.

T Fukushima1, T Ikata, Y Taoka, S Takata.   

Abstract

Spinal cord plasticity in 55 patients with cervical compression myelopathy was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging, by which the transverse area of the spinal cord was measured at the site of maximum compression before and after surgery and compared with the conventional modalities of computed tomographic myelography. A high correlation (r = 0.901, P less than 0.01) was observed between the preoperative measurements of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic myelography. The preoperative transverse area was in good correlation with the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (r = 0.466, P less than 0.01). In most patients with a spinal cord area of less than 0.45 cm2, the clinical results were poor despite considerable morphologic restoration of the spinal canal obtained after decompression surgery, reflecting an irreversible pathology developed in the spinal cord.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1801267     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199110001-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Qualitative assessment of cervical spinal stenosis: observer variability on CT and MR images.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stafira; Jagadeesh R Sonnad; William T C Yuh; David R Huard; Robin E Acker; Dan L Nguyen; Joan E Maley; Faridali G Ramji; Wen-Bin Li; Christopher M Loftus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Setsuro Komiya; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clustered clinical findings for diagnosis of cervical spine myelopathy.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Christopher Brown; Robert Isaacs; Matthew Roman; Samuel Davis; William Richardson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

4.  Surgery vs Conservative Care for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Surgery Is Appropriate for Progressive Myelopathy.

Authors:  Zoher Ghogawala; Edward C Benzel; K Daniel Riew; Erica F Bisson; Robert F Heary
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Quantitative analysis of the spinal cord motoneuron under chronic compression: an experimental observation in the mouse.

Authors:  H Baba; Y Maezawa; S Imura; N Kawahara; K Nakahashi; K Tomita
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Three-dimensional topographic analysis of spinal accessory motoneurons under chronic mechanical compression: an experimental study in the mouse.

Authors:  H Baba; Y Maezawa; K Uchida; S Imura; N Kawahara; K Tomita; M Kudo
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Does increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on MR images due to cervical myelopathy predict prognosis?

Authors:  Y Morio; K Yamamoto; K Kuranobu; M Murata; K Tuda
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical myelopathy: an updated predictive model.

Authors:  Josef Bednarik; Zdenek Kadanka; Ladislav Dusek; Milos Kerkovsky; Stanislav Vohanka; Oldrich Novotny; Igor Urbanek; Dagmar Kratochvilova
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging findings and reported symptoms in patients with chronic cervical dysfunction.

Authors:  Rogelio Coronado; Beverly Hudson; Charles Sheets; Matthew Roman; Robert Isaacs; Jessie Mathers; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

10.  MRI morphometric characterisation of the paediatric cervical spine and spinal cord in children with MPS IVA (Morquio-Brailsford syndrome).

Authors:  Guirish A Solanki; William B Lo; Christian J Hendriksz
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.