Andrew C Argent1, Christopher J L Newth, Max Klein. 1. University of Cape Town, Division of Paediatric Critical Care and Children's Heart Disease, School of Child and Adolescent Health, Cape Town, South Africa. aargent@ich.uct.ac.za
Abstract
RATIONALE: The assessment of the severity of croup and response to therapy has remained a clinical one. Despite recognition of the importance of a reproducible and easily applicable method for objectively measuring severity, currently, no such technique exists. OBJECTIVES: We postulated that measurements of air flow and intrathoracic pressure changes in patients with severe croup would provide detailed information about the mechanics of breathing and the potential for the development of continuous bedside methods for objective monitoring of upper airway obstruction. METHODS: Twenty out of 21 eligible infants and children with severe upper airway obstruction from croup, and 5 control participants, were studied under light sedation utilizing face masks and nasogastric feeding tubes for flow and esophageal pressure measurements. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Children with croup had lower tidal volumes, but breathed faster, thus maintaining similar minute volumes to the controls. During inspiration, all but 2 croup patients (but no controls) displayed flow limitation. Area within the flow-volume curve was significantly decreased and minute ventilation for effort expended was nearly 4.5 times higher in croup patients than in controls. Peak-to-trough pleural pressure swings, pressure-rate product and pressure-time integral were also significantly higher than in controls (p<0.001) and returned to the normal range in the 9 patients who were subsequently intubated (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe croup maintain minute ventilation by means of huge increases in intrathoracic pressure changes. Inspiratory flow limitation is present. In future outcome studies, measurements of respiratory function that do not include intrathoracic pressure changes are unlikely to be effective measures of the severity of croup.
RATIONALE: The assessment of the severity of croup and response to therapy has remained a clinical one. Despite recognition of the importance of a reproducible and easily applicable method for objectively measuring severity, currently, no such technique exists. OBJECTIVES: We postulated that measurements of air flow and intrathoracic pressure changes in patients with severe croup would provide detailed information about the mechanics of breathing and the potential for the development of continuous bedside methods for objective monitoring of upper airway obstruction. METHODS: Twenty out of 21 eligible infants and children with severe upper airway obstruction from croup, and 5 control participants, were studied under light sedation utilizing face masks and nasogastric feeding tubes for flow and esophageal pressure measurements. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Children with croup had lower tidal volumes, but breathed faster, thus maintaining similar minute volumes to the controls. During inspiration, all but 2 croup patients (but no controls) displayed flow limitation. Area within the flow-volume curve was significantly decreased and minute ventilation for effort expended was nearly 4.5 times higher in croup patients than in controls. Peak-to-trough pleural pressure swings, pressure-rate product and pressure-time integral were also significantly higher than in controls (p<0.001) and returned to the normal range in the 9 patients who were subsequently intubated (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with severe croup maintain minute ventilation by means of huge increases in intrathoracic pressure changes. Inspiratory flow limitation is present. In future outcome studies, measurements of respiratory function that do not include intrathoracic pressure changes are unlikely to be effective measures of the severity of croup.
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Justin Hotz; Rica Morzov; Rutger Flink; Asavari Kamerkar; Patrick A Ross; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; James B Schneider; Rica Morzov; Barry Markovitz; Christopher J L Newth Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Gilles Cambonie; Christophe Milési; Samir Jaber; Francis Amsallem; Eric Barbotte; Jean-Charles Picaud; Stefan Matecki Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Justin Hotz; Rica Morzov; Rutger C Flink; Asvari Kamerkar; Marie LaFortune; Gerrard F Rafferty; Patrick A Ross; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Rutger Flink; Justin Hotz; Patrick A Ross; Anoopindar Ghuman; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Christopher J L Newth; Shekhar Venkataraman; Douglas F Willson; Kathleen L Meert; Rick Harrison; J Michael Dean; Murray Pollack; Jerry Zimmerman; Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Joseph A Carcillo; Carol E Nicholson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Justin C Hotz; Dinnel Bornstein; Kristen Kohler; Erin Smith; Anil Suresh; Margaret Klein; Anoopindar Bhalla; Christopher J Newth; Robinder G Khemani Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 3.971