Literature DB >> 18008039

Warfarin monitoring: point-of-care INR testing limitations and interpretation of the prothrombin time.

Alan K Jacobson1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2007        PMID： 18008039     DOI： 10.1007/s11239-007-0098-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN： 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Accuracy of laboratory and portable monitor international normalized ratio determinations. Comparison with a criterion standard.

Authors:  S S Kaatz; R H White; J Hill; E Mascha; J E Humphries; D M Becker
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-09-25

2.  Poor agreement among prothrombin time international normalized ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents.

Authors:  Juha Horsti; Helena Uppa; Juhani A Vilpo
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Elaine M Hylek; Alan S Go; Yuchiao Chang; Nancy G Jensvold; Lori E Henault; Joe V Selby; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Hospital length of stay in patients initiated on direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: a real-world single-center study.

Authors:  Hisham Badreldin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Analysis of the Dose-Response Relationship Between the International Normalized Ratio and Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis Using Restricted Cubic Spline Functions.

Authors:  Juntao Tan; Yuxin He; Zhanbiao Li; Qinghua Zhang; Yanzhi Yang; Qian Xu; Xiaomei Xu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.