Literature DB >> 18006318

In vivo knee laxity in flexion and extension: a radiographic study in 30 older healthy subjects.

P J C Heesterbeek1, N Verdonschot, A B Wymenga.   

Abstract

In order to determine how "tight" a total knee prosthesis should be implanted, it is important to know the amount of laxity in a healthy knee. The objective of this study was to determine knee laxity in extension and flexion in healthy, non-arthritic knees of subjects similar in age to patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty and to provide guidelines for the orthopaedic surgeon in his attempt to restore the stability of an osteoarthritic knee to normal. Thirty healthy subjects (15 male, 15 female), mean age 62 (SD 6.4) years, were included in the study. For each subject one, randomly selected, knee was stressed in extension and in 70 degrees flexion (15 Nm). Varus and valgus laxity were measured on radiographs. The passive range of motion and active flexion was assessed. Mean valgus laxity in extension was 2.3 degrees (SD 0.9, range 0.2 degrees -4.1 degrees ). In extension mean varus laxity was 2.8 degrees (SD 1.3, range 0.6 degrees -5.4 degrees ). In flexion, mean valgus laxity was 2.5 degrees (SD 1.5, range 0.0 degrees -6.0 degrees ) and mean varus laxity was 3.1 degrees (SD 2.0, range 0.1 degrees -7.0 degrees ). Varus and valgus knee laxity in extension and in flexion were comparable. This study shows that the normal knee in this age group has an inherent degree of varus-valgus laxity. Whether the results of the present study can be used to optimise the total knee arthroplasty implantation technique requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006318     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  23 in total

1.  The influence of coronal plane deformity on mediolateral ligament status: an observational study in varus knees.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; H Vandenneucker; J Vanlauwe; J Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nienke M Kosse; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Janneke J P Schimmel; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Ate B Wymenga; Koen C Defoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Internal-external malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty increases tibial force imbalance but does not change laxities of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Jeremy Riley; Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Patient-related factors influence stiffness of the soft tissue complex during intraoperative gap balancing in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; N Haffner; A B Wymenga; J Stifter; P Ritschl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anatomical reconstruction of posterolateral corner and combined injuries of the knee.

Authors:  W A van der Wal; P J C Heesterbeek; T G van Tienen; V J Busch; J H M van Ochten; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Intraoperative load-sensing drives the level of constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty: Surgical technique and review of the literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Risitano; Brian Karamian; Pier Francesco Indelli
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-06-02

7.  Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty limits high tibial forces, differences in tibial forces between compartments, and abnormal tibial contact kinematics during passive flexion.

Authors:  Joshua D Roth; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Collateral ligament laxity in knees: what is normal?

Authors:  Kamal Deep
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Moderate clinical improvement after revision arthroplasty of the severely stiff knee.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; J H M Goosen; J J P Schimmel; K C Defoort; G G van Hellemondt; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Ligament releases do not lead to increased postoperative varus-valgus laxity in flexion and extension: a prospective clinical study in 49 TKR patients.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; N L W Keijsers; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.