Literature DB >> 18006279

European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Peter Tenke1, Bela Kovacs, Truls E Bjerklund Johansen, Tetsuro Matsumoto, Paul A Tambyah, Kurt G Naber.   

Abstract

We surveyed the extensive literature regarding the development, therapy and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs). We systematically searched for meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials available in Medline giving preference to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and also considered other relevant publications, rating them on the basis of their quality. The studies' recommendations, rated according to a modification of the US Department of Health and Human Services (1992), give a close-to-evidence-based guideline for all medical disciplines, with special emphasis on urology where catheter care is an important issue. The survey found that the urinary tract is the commonest source of nosocomial infection, particularly when the bladder is catheterised (IIa). Most catheter-associated UTIs are derived from the patient's own colonic flora (IIb) and the catheter predisposes to UTI in several ways. The most important risk factor for the development of catheter-associated bacteriuria is the duration of catheterisation (IIa). Most episodes of short-term catheter-associated bacteriuria are asymptomatic and are caused by a single organism (IIa). Further organisms tend to be acquired by patients catheterised for more than 30 days. The clinician should be aware of two priorities: the catheter system should remain closed and the duration of catheterisation should be minimal (A). While the catheter is in place, systemic antimicrobial treatment of asymptomatic catheter-associated bacteriuria is not recommended (A), except for some special cases. Routine urine culture in an asymptomatic catheterised patient is also not recommended (C) because treatment is in general not necessary. Antibiotic treatment is recommended only for symptomatic infection (B). Long-term antibiotic suppressive therapy is not effective (A). Antibiotic irrigation of the catheter and bladder is of no advantage (A). Routine urine cultures are not recommended if the catheter is draining properly (C). A minority of patients can be managed with the use of the non-return (flip) valve catheter, avoiding the closed drainage bag. Such patients may exchange the convenience of on-demand drainage with an increased risk of infection. Patients with urethral catheters in place for 10 years or more should be screened annually for bladder cancer (C). Clinicians should always consider alternatives to indwelling urethral catheters that are less prone to causing symptomatic infection. In appropriate patients, suprapubic catheters, condom drainage systems and intermittent catheterisation are each preferable to indwelling urethral catheterisation (B).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006279     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  58 in total

Review 1.  Asymptomatic bacteriuria: when the treatment is worse than the disease.

Authors:  Barbara W Trautner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Urinary tract infections in the elderly].

Authors:  Klaus Friedrich Becher; Ingo Klempien; Andreas Wiedemann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 3.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Silver or nitrofurazone impregnation of urinary catheters has a minimal effect on uropathogen adherence.

Authors:  Devak G Desai; Kershena S Liao; Manuel E Cevallos; Barbara W Trautner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Genetics of innate immunity and UTI susceptibility.

Authors:  Bryndís Ragnarsdóttir; Nataliya Lutay; Jenny Grönberg-Hernandez; Bela Köves; Catharina Svanborg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Biocide activity against urinary catheter pathogens.

Authors:  Sladjana Malic; Rachael P C Jordan; Mark G J Waters; David J Stickler; David W Williams
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Adequacy of an evidence-based treatment guideline for complicated urinary tract infections in the Netherlands and the effectiveness of guideline adherence.

Authors:  V Spoorenberg; J M Prins; E E Stobberingh; M E J L Hulscher; S E Geerlings
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Hospital epidemiology and infection control in acute-care settings.

Authors:  Emily R M Sydnor; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Epidemiology, treatment and prevention of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  F M E Wagenlehner; Mete Cek; Kurt G Naber; Hiroshi Kiyota; Truls E Bjerklund-Johansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Solidago, orthosiphon, birch and cranberry extracts can decrease microbial colonization and biofilm development in indwelling urinary catheter: a microbiologic and ultrastructural pilot study.

Authors:  Tommaso Cai; Iole Caola; Francesco Tessarolo; Federico Piccoli; Carolina D'Elia; Patrizio Caciagli; Giandomenico Nollo; Gianni Malossini; Gabriella Nesi; Sandra Mazzoli; Riccardo Bartoletti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.