Literature DB >> 18006214

Diagnostic value of free prostate-specific antigen among men with a prostate-specific antigen level of <3.0 microg per liter.

Patrik Finne1, Anssi Auvinen, Liisa Määttänen, Teuvo L Tammela, Mirja Ruutu, Harri Juusela, Paula Martikainen, Matti Hakama, Ulf-Håkan Stenman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA) improves the diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer when the serum level of total PSA (tPSA) is elevated. Approximately 14% of men with a tPSA below 3 microg/l have prostate cancer on biopsy, but the diagnostic value of %fPSA in such men is rather unknown. The purpose was to estimate the impact of %fPSA on future prostate cancer risk among men with a normal tPSA in prostate cancer screening. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The first round of the Finnish arm of the European Randomized Trial for Screening of Prostate Cancer in 1996 to 1999 comprised 20,793 men aged 55-67 yr. Screen-negative men (tPSA level below 3.0 microg/l, n=17,680) were followed up until the end of 2003. Cumulative risk of prostate cancer was calculated as a function of %fPSA.
RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 5.8 yr (range, 0-7.7 yr), 327 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 25% of them had a Gleason score of 7 or higher. Five years after the first screening, cumulative risk of prostate cancer was 1.7% (95%CI, 1.5-1.9%). Men with a %fPSA in the lowest quartile (<14.2%) showed a 6.9-fold risk compared with those with a level in the highest quartile (>23.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: In men with a low serum tPSA, a low %fPSA is a strong predictor of later diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006214     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  A pilot study evaluating serum pro-prostate-specific antigen in patients with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Antonino Sottile; Cinzia Ortega; Alfredo Berruti; Monica Mangioni; Sara Saponaro; Alessandra Polo; Veronica Prati; Giovanni Muto; Massimo Aglietta; Filippo Montemurro
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Prostate kallikrein markers in diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  David Ulmert; M Frank O'Brien; Anders S Bjartell; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Integration of quantitative diffusion kurtosis imaging and prostate specific antigen in differential diagnostic of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weigen Yao; Jiaju Zheng; Chunhong Han; Pengcong Lu; Lihua Mao; Jie Liu; GuiCha Wang; Shufang Zou; Lifeng Li; Ying Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Porous silicon antibody microarrays for quantitative analysis: measurement of free and total PSA in clinical plasma samples.

Authors:  Kerstin Järås; Belinda Adler; Axel Tojo; Johan Malm; György Marko-Varga; Hans Lilja; Thomas Laurell
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Cumulative probability of prostate cancer detection in biopsy according to free/total PSA ratio in men with total PSA levels of 2.1-10.0 ng/ml at population screening.

Authors:  Yasuhide Kitagawa; Satoru Ueno; Kouji Izumi; Yoshifumi Kadono; Hiroyuki Konaka; Atsushi Mizokami; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Prostate-specific antigen-based population screening for prostate cancer: current status in Japan and future perspective in Asia.

Authors:  Yasuhide Kitagawa; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Tumour biomarkers: homeostasis as a novel prognostic indicator.

Authors:  Michela Falco; Giuseppe Palma; Domenica Rea; Davide De Biase; Stefania Scala; Massimiliano D'Aiuto; Gaetano Facchini; Sisto Perdonà; Antonio Barbieri; Claudio Arra
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.411

Review 9.  Application of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Rapid Detection and In Situ Diagnosis in Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Tatsuya Onishi; Kisyo Mihara; Sachiko Matsuda; Satoshi Sakamoto; Akihiro Kuwahata; Masaki Sekino; Moriaki Kusakabe; Hiroshi Handa; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.