Literature DB >> 18006010

Hypermethylation of cell-free serum DNA indicates worse outcome in patients with bladder cancer.

Jörg Ellinger1, Nadja El Kassem, Lukas C Heukamp, Swapna Matthews, Figen Cubukluoz, Philip Kahl, Frank G Perabo, Stefan C Müller, Alexander von Ruecker, Patrick J Bastian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: CpG island hypermethylation is a frequent event in bladder carcinogenesis and progression. We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of hypermethylation in cell-free serum DNA of patients with bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 45 patients with bladder cancer undergoing cystectomy and 45 with histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia serving as controls. Hypermethylation at APC, DAPK, GSTP1, PTGS2, TIG1 and Reprimo was analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction following methylation sensitive restriction endonuclease treatment.
RESULTS: Hypermethylation at the APC and GSTP1 promoter was detected in 59% of cases, whereas TIG1 (32%), PTGS2 (24%) and DAPK (2%) were less frequently hypermethylated. In the benign prostatic hyperplasia group 3 patients also harbored methylated GSTP1 DNA, whereas none of the other gene sites was methylated. Hypermethylation at APC, GSTP1 or TIG1 distinguished patients with bladder cancer and controls most accurately with 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Hypermethylation significantly correlated with prognostic unfavorable clinicopathological parameters, including APC with pT stage, GSTP1, or GSTP1 or TIG1 with multifocal bladder cancer and APC, or APC or TIG1 with surgical margin positivity. Bladder cancer specific mortality was significantly increased in patients with APC hypermethylation.
CONCLUSIONS: The detection of hypermethylation in cell-free serum DNA provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information that can still be improved by combining the results of 3 gene sites (APC, GSTP1 and TIG1). The presence of hypermethylated DNA in the serum of patients with bladder cancer is associated with a worse outcome. Our results suggest that measuring hypermethylation in the serum of patients with bladder cancer is a useful biomarker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006010     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

1.  Hypermethylated SFRP1, but none of other nine genes "informative" for western countries, is valuable for bladder cancer detection in Mainland China.

Authors:  Jinfeng Sun; Zhou Chen; Tongyu Zhu; Jian Yu; Kelong Ma; Hongyu Zhang; Yinghua He; Xiaoying Luo; Jingde Zhu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  DNA methylation-based biomarkers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Raju Kandimalla; Angela A van Tilborg; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  DNA methylation as a universal biomarker.

Authors:  Victor V Levenson
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.225

4.  Caspase 8 and maspin are downregulated in breast cancer cells due to CpG site promoter methylation.

Authors:  Yanyuan Wu; Monica Alvarez; Dennis J Slamon; Phillip Koeffler; Jaydutt V Vadgama
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Quantitative methylation profiles for multiple tumor suppressor gene promoters in salivary gland tumors.

Authors:  Megan L Durr; Wojciech K Mydlarz; Chunbo Shao; Marianna L Zahurak; Alice Y Chuang; Mohammad O Hoque; William H Westra; Nanette J Liegeois; Joseph A Califano; David Sidransky; Patrick K Ha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Epigenetics in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Enokida; Masayuki Nakagawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Detection of cancer-specific epigenomic changes in biofluids: powerful tools in biomarker discovery and application.

Authors:  André Nogueira da Costa; Zdenko Herceg
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 8.  Clinical states model for biomarkers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Matthew Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 9.  The current role and future directions of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Michael Rink; Heidi Schwarzenbach; Sabine Riethdorf; Armin Soave
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Toward urinary cell-free DNA-based treatment of urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yujiro Hayashi; Kazutoshi Fujita
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.