Literature DB >> 18005765

Adapting to the changing paradigm of management of colon injuries.

Karen Woo1, Matthew T Wilson, Kelly Killeen, Daniel R Margulies.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on the evolution that the management of colonic trauma has undergone since the early 1990s, we hypothesized that the use of diversion has decreased at our institution over the last decade.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who presented to our trauma center with colon injuries between 1995 and 2006.
RESULTS: A total of 81 patients were analyzed. Twenty-five patients (31%) were treated with diversion and 56 patients (69%) underwent primary repair or resection with anastomosis. The rate of diversion in the first half of the study period as well as the second half of the study period was 31%. There was no difference in the complication rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The usage of diversion remains higher than current literature would indicate. As a result, we are implementing a program that will actively encourage our trauma surgeons to improve the quality of patient care by incorporating evidence-based medicine into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18005765     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  2 in total

1.  The safety of primary repair or anastomosis in high-risk trauma patients.

Authors:  Evangelos D Lolis; Eleni Theodoridou; Nikistratos Vogiatzis; Despina Neonaki; Charalambos Markakis; Kritolaos Daskalakis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Independent Predictors of Treatment Modality for Penetrating Colon Injury.

Authors:  Akif S Gür; Kemal Atahan; Ercüment Tarcan; Evren Durak; Atilla Çökmez; Hakan Küpeli
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.693

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.