Literature DB >> 1800540

Posterior composite restorations. Where and how they work best.

R E Jordan1, M Suzuki.   

Abstract

Despite its increased use, composite resin is still technique-sensitive. The authors offer correct placement steps and indicate where these restorations will do well.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1991        PMID： 1800540     DOI： 10.14219/jada.archive.1991.0321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN： 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  5 in total

1.  Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental resins/composites containing nano fibrillar silicate.

Authors:  Ming Tian; Yi Gao; Yi Liu; Yiliang Liao; Nyle E Hedin; Hao Fong
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  The influence of different composite placement techniques on microleakage in preparations with high C- factor: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Lekha Santhosh; Kusum Bashetty; Gururaj Nadig
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-07

3.  Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Dental Composites Reinforced with Electrospun Nylon 6 Nanocomposite Nanofibers Containing Highly Aligned Fibrillar Silicate Single Crystals.

Authors:  Ming Tian; Yi Gao; Yi Liu; Yiliang Liao; Riwei Xu; Nyle E Hedin; Hao Fong
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental resins/composites containing halloysite nanotubes.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Yong Zhao; Weidong Wu; Tao Xu; Hao Fong
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 5.  Resin composites reinforced by nanoscaled fibers or tubes for dental regeneration.

Authors:  Xiaoming Li; Wei Liu; Lianwen Sun; Katerina E Aifantis; Bo Yu; Yubo Fan; Qingling Feng; Fuzhai Cui; Fumio Watari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.