Literature DB >> 18005379

Pain management of opioid-treated cancer patients in hospital settings in Denmark.

L Lundorff1, V Peuckmann, P Sjøgren.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the performance and quality of cancer pain management in hospital settings.
METHODS: Anaesthesiologists specialised in pain and palliative medicine studied pain management in departments of oncology and surgery. Study days were randomly chosen and patients treated with oral opioids were included. Information regarding pain aetiology and mechanisms, pain medications and opioid side effects were registered from the medical records and by examining patients. Pain intensity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory.
RESULTS: In total, 59 cancer patients were included. In 49 (83%) patients pain aetiology was assessed by the physicians of the departments of oncology and surgery. In only 19 (32%) patients they assessed pain mechanisms. The median oral morphine dose was 120 mg/day (range: 10-720 mg/day). Seventy-eight per cent of patients received opioids at adequate regular intervals according to the duration of action. In 88% of the patients supplemental short-acting oral opioids were given on demand and the median supplemental oral dose was 16.5% of the daily dose. Seven patients with neuropathic pain received adjuvant drugs, whereas six patients with non-neuropathic pain received adjuvant drugs. Regarding opioid side effects only constipation and nausea were treated in the majority of the patients. Average pain intensity in the last 24 h for the total number of patients (n=59) < or =5 cm was 88.1% (confidence interval 77.1-95.1).
CONCLUSION: Cancer pain was prevalent in opioid-treated patients in hospital settings: however, focussing on average pain intensity, the outcome seems favourable compared with other countries. Pain mechanisms were seldom examined and adjuvant drugs were not specifically used for neuropathic pain. Opioid dosing intervals and supplemental opioid doses were most often adequate. However, opioid side effects were highly prevalent and most side effects were left untreated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18005379     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  4 in total

1.  Complementary, Traditional and Spiritual Practices Used by Cancer Patients in Turkey When Coping with Pain: An Exploratory Case Study.

Authors:  Ezgi Karadag; Seda Yüksel
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-05-14

2.  Symptom clusters in patients with cancer in the hospice/palliative care setting.

Authors:  Stephen J Stapleton; Janean Holden; Joel Epstein; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Gender Difference in Pain Management Among Adult Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Assessment.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Alodhayani; Khalid M Almutairi; Jason M Vinluan; Norah Alsadhan; Turky H Almigbal; Wadi B Alonazi; Mohammed Ali Batais
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-08-26

4.  Benefits of using the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with cancer pain: an intervention study conducted in Swedish hospitals.

Authors:  Viveka Andersson; Stefan Bergman; Ingela Henoch; Hanna Simonsson; Karin Ahlberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.