Jeroen H J Ensink1, Tariq Mahmood, Anders Dalsgaard. 1. Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. jeroen.ensink@lshtm.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Vegetables irrigated with untreated domestic wastewater were, at the time of harvest, analysed for the presence of the faecal indicator, Escherichia coli, and helminth eggs in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Vegetables from the same harvested batch were collected approximately 12 h later from the local market. RESULTS: The survey found relatively low concentrations of E. coli (1.9 E. coli per gram), but relatively high concentrations of helminths (0.7 eggs per gram) on vegetables collected from agricultural fields. Higher concentration of both E. coli (14.3 E. coli per gram) and helminths (2.1 eggs per gram) were recovered from the vegetables collected from the market. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey suggest that unhygienic post harvest handling was the major source of produce contamination. Interventions at the market, such as the provision of clean water to wash produce in, are better ways to protect public health and more cost effective than wastewater treatment.
OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Vegetables irrigated with untreated domestic wastewater were, at the time of harvest, analysed for the presence of the faecal indicator, Escherichia coli, and helminth eggs in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Vegetables from the same harvested batch were collected approximately 12 h later from the local market. RESULTS: The survey found relatively low concentrations of E. coli (1.9 E. coli per gram), but relatively high concentrations of helminths (0.7 eggs per gram) on vegetables collected from agricultural fields. Higher concentration of both E. coli (14.3 E. coli per gram) and helminths (2.1 eggs per gram) were recovered from the vegetables collected from the market. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey suggest that unhygienic post harvest handling was the major source of produce contamination. Interventions at the market, such as the provision of clean water to wash produce in, are better ways to protect public health and more cost effective than wastewater treatment.
Authors: Angela R Harris; Mohammad Aminul Islam; Leanne Unicomb; Alexandria B Boehm; Stephen Luby; Jennifer Davis; Amy J Pickering Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Alexander Schriewer; Mitsunori Odagiri; Stefan Wuertz; Pravas R Misra; Pinaki Panigrahi; Thomas Clasen; Marion W Jenkins Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sarah K Dickin; Corinne J Schuster-Wallace; Manzoor Qadir; Katherine Pizzacalla Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Prince Antwi-Agyei; Sandy Cairncross; Anne Peasey; Vivien Price; Jane Bruce; Kelly Baker; Christine Moe; Joseph Ampofo; George Armah; Jeroen Ensink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 3.240