Literature DB >> 18004960

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pituitary macroadenoma surgery: an assessment of visual outcome.

Jesse Jones1, John Ruge.   

Abstract

Pituitary macroadenomas most frequently present with visual loss. Although transsphenoidal surgery remains the treatment of choice for patients with neurological manifestations, there have been several advances in its implementation over the last 5 years. Intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has emerged as a novel quality control measure, with the potential to guide the surgeon to tumor remnants concealed from the operating microscope. Investigators have reported enhanced resections when using intraoperative MR imaging, leading to complete tumor removal in a larger proportion of cases. Further debulking of unresectable lesions may also prove beneficial in delaying symptom recurrence and facilitating radiotherapy, where distance between the tumor and optic chiasm is an important predictor of visual outcome. However, confirmation of such advantages is complicated by the fact that most macroadenomas are both indolent and hormonally silent, necessitating years of follow-up. Experienced pituitary surgeons will operate as safely with intraoperative MR imaging as without it, perhaps due to a balance between more elaborate resections and better visualization. Intraoperative MR imaging represents a new technique applied to an old problem in tumor surgery: complete, safe resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18004960     DOI: 10.3171/FOC-07/11/E12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  4 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during surgery for pituitary adenomas: pros and cons.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Sven-Martin Schlaffer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  The utility of high-resolution intraoperative MRI in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary macroadenomas: early experience in the Advanced Multimodality Image Guided Operating suite.

Authors:  Hasan A Zaidi; Kenneth De Los Reyes; Garni Barkhoudarian; Zachary N Litvack; Wenya Linda Bi; Jordina Rincon-Torroella; Srinivasan Mukundan; Ian F Dunn; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Volumetric measurement for comparison of the accuracy between intraoperative CT and postoperative MR imaging in pituitary adenoma surgery.

Authors:  C-C Lee; S-T Lee; C-N Chang; P-C Pai; Y-L Chen; T-C Hsieh; C-C Chuang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Identification of tumor residuals in pituitary adenoma surgery with intraoperative MRI: do we need gadolinium?

Authors:  Georg Gohla; Benjamin Bender; Marcos Tatagiba; Jürgen Honegger; Ulrike Ernemann; Constantin Roder
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.