Literature DB >> 18004948

Neural correlates of morphological processes in Hebrew.

Atira Bick1, Gadi Goelman, Ram Frost.   

Abstract

Is morphology a discrete and independent element of lexical structure or does it simply reflect a fine tuning of the system to the statistical correlation that exists among the orthographic and semantic properties of words? Imaging studies in English failed to show unequivocal morphological activation that is distinct from semantic or orthographic activation. Cognitive research in Hebrew has revealed that morphological decomposition is an important component of print processing. In Hebrew, morphological relatedness does not necessarily induce a clear semantic relatedness, thus, Hebrew provides a unique opportunity to investigate the neural substrates of morphological processing. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, participants were required to perform judgment tasks of morphological relatedness, semantic relatedness, rhyming, and orthographic similarity. Half of the morphologically related words were semantically related and half were semantically unrelated. This design was chosen to induce explicit morphological processing. We identified two locations involved in morphological processing: the left middle frontal gyrus and the left inferior parietal sulcus. Comparing locations of morphological related activation to the locations of semantic and orthographic related activation, we found that the areas neighbored but only partially overlapped. The similarity in activation between the two morphological conditions eliminates the possibility that morphological activation simply results from the semantic properties of the words. These results demonstrate the important role of morphological processing in reading and suggest that morphological analysis is a distinct process of visual word recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18004948     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Brain bases of morphological processing in young children.

Authors:  Maria M Arredondo; Ka I Ip; Lucy Shih Ju Hsu; Twila Tardif; Ioulia Kovelman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The neural correlates of morphological complexity processing: Detecting structure in pseudowords.

Authors:  Swetlana Schuster; Mathias Scharinger; Colin Brooks; Aditi Lahiri; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Hebrew brain vs. English brain: language modulates the way it is processed.

Authors:  Atira S Bick; Gadi Goelman; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Imaging implicit morphological processing: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  Atira S Bick; Ram Frost; Gadi Goelman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Tracking second language immersion across time: Evidence from a bi-directional longitudinal cross-linguistic fMRI study.

Authors:  Henry Brice; Stephen J Frost; Atira Sara Bick; Peter J Molfese; Jay G Rueckl; Kenneth R Pugh; Ram Frost
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Do not throw out the baby with the bath water: choosing an effective baseline for a functional localizer of speech processing.

Authors:  Nadav Stoppelman; Tamar Harpaz; Michal Ben-Shachar
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  An FMRI study of grammatical morpheme processing associated with nouns and verbs in Chinese.

Authors:  Xi Yu; Yanchao Bi; Zaizhu Han; Sam-Po Law
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neural Correlates of Morphological Processing: Evidence from Chinese.

Authors:  Lijuan Zou; Jerome L Packard; Zhichao Xia; Youyi Liu; Hua Shu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The Form of Morphemes: MEG Evidence From Masked Priming of Two Hebrew Templates.

Authors:  Itamar Kastner; Liina Pylkkänen; Alec Marantz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-12

10.  Morphological and Whole-Word Semantic Processing Are Distinct: Event Related Potentials Evidence From Spoken Word Recognition in Chinese.

Authors:  Lijuan Zou; Jerome L Packard; Zhichao Xia; Youyi Liu; Hua Shu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.