Literature DB >> 18003987

Radiation dose limits and liver toxicities resulting from multiple yttrium-90 radioembolization treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Joseph Y Young1, Thomas K Rhee, Bassel Atassi, Vanessa L Gates, Laura Kulik, Mary F Mulcahy, Andrew C Larson, Robert K Ryu, Kent T Sato, Robert J Lewandowski, Reed A Omary, Riad Salem.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between cumulative hepatic lobar radiation dose and liver toxicities in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with multiple sessions of yttrium-90 radioembolization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with HCC (age range, 46-82 years) underwent radioembolization with 90Y. Patients were classified according to the Okuda scoring system. All patients received single liver lobar treatments on two or more occasions according to standard clinical 90Y embolization protocol. Cumulative radiation dose to each liver lobe was measured and patients were followed to assess liver toxicities. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student t test and Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: Patients with Okuda stage I disease received more treatments than those with Okuda stage II disease (mean, 2.65 vs 2.24; P<.05). For average cumulative radiation dose, patients with Okuda stage I disease received 247 Gy (range, 88-482 Gy) and those with Okuda stage II disease received 198 Gy (range, 51-361 Gy; P<.05). A total of 13 toxicities occurred in seven patients (16%). Patients with Okuda stage I disease were given a greater cumulative dose than patients with Okuda stage II disease before worsening of liver function: 390 Gy versus 196 Gy (P<.005). For patients with Okuda stage I disease, a higher cumulative radiation dose was associated with occurrence of one or more toxicities: 222 Gy (no toxicities) versus 390 Gy (>or=1 toxicity; P<.005). No correlation between cumulative radiation dose and liver toxicities existed in patients with Okuda stage II disease. The maximum tolerated dose was between 222 and 390 Gy. Median survival times were 660 and 431 days for patients with Okuda stage I and stage II disease, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCC can tolerate high cumulative radiation doses with 90Y therapy. Compared with patients with Okuda stage II disease, patients with Okuda stage I disease tolerate a higher cumulative radiation dose without liver toxicity, but liver toxicities increase with increasing cumulative radiation doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18003987     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  24 in total

Review 1.  Radioembolization for primary and metastatic liver cancer.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Ahsun Riaz; Mary F Mulcahy; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  [Intra-arterial treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma].

Authors:  O Pellerin; J-F Geschwind
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 3.  Chemoembolization and radioembolization for metastatic disease to the liver: available data and future studies.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

4.  Radiobiological considerations for radioembolization with 188Re-microspheres.

Authors:  Liane Oehme; Jörg Kotzerke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Loco-regional therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: Selecting an optimal therapy.

Authors:  Thomas J Byrne; Jorge Rakela
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 6.  SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable liver cancers.

Authors:  Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

7.  Consensus for Radiotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma from The 5th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE 2014): Current Practice and Future Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Hee Chul Park; Jeong Il Yu; Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng; Zhao Chong Zeng; Ji Hong Hong; Michael Lian Chek Wang; Mi Sook Kim; Kwan Hwa Chi; Po-Ching Liang; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Wan-Yee Lau; Kwang Hyub Han; Pierce Kah-Hoe Chow; Jinsil Seong
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 8.  Adjuvant and chemopreventive therapies for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Jian-Hong Zhong; Qing-Lian Zhong; Le-Qun Li; Hang Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 9.  Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and perspectives.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Cinzia Pettinato; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

Review 10.  Radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical review.

Authors:  Saad-M Ibrahim; Robert-J Lewandowski; Kent-T Sato; Vanessa-L Gates; Laura Kulik; Mary-F Mulcahy; Robert-K Ryu; Reed-A Omary; Riad Salem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.