Literature DB >> 1800378

In vitro activity of cefpodoxime and ten other cephalosporins against gram-positive cocci, Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including beta-lactamase producers.

B Wiedemann1, E Luhmer, M T Zühlsdorf.   

Abstract

Cefpodoxime, the deesterified part of the orally available cefpodoxime proxetil, is active against most Enterobacteriaceae with MIC50 of 0.06 to 2 mg/l. Only Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii strains show MIC50 of 4 mg/l. Coagulase negative staphylococci have a MIC50 of 2, while Staphylococcus aureus strains have a MIC of 4 mg/l. In comparison to other orally available cephalosporins cefpodoxime is slightly less active than cefixime and cefotiam against gram-negative bacteria but more active than cefuroxime, cefaclor, and cephalexin. Against staphylococci the activity of cefpodoxime is comparable to that of cefotiam and cefuroxime and superior to cefaclor and cephalexin, while cefixime does not have sufficient activity against these species. Like all cephalosporins cefpodoxime has no activity against enterococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1800378     DOI: 10.1007/BF01645370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  5 in total

1.  beta-Lactamase stability and in vitro activity of oral cephalosporins against strains possessing well-characterized mechanisms of resistance.

Authors:  C C Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of CS-807, a new oral cephalosporin.

Authors:  Y Utsui; M Inoue; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antimicrobial activity and disk diffusion susceptibility testing of U-76,253A (R-3746), the active metabolite of the new cephalosporin ester, U-76,252 (CS-807).

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antibacterial activities of cefpodoxime, cefixime, and ceftriaxone.

Authors:  C C Knapp; J Sierra-Madero; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Studies on orally active cephalosporin esters.

Authors:  K Fujimoto; S Ishihara; H Yanagisawa; J Ide; E Nakayama; H Nakao; S Sugawara; M Iwata
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.649

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Microbiological evaluation of cefpodoxime proxetil.

Authors:  B Wiedemann; E Luhmer; M T Zühlsdorf
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Cefpodoxime proxetil: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections in paediatric patients.

Authors:  B Fulton; C M Perry
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Cefpodoxime-proxetil versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for short-term therapy of uncomplicated acute cystitis in women.

Authors:  Demetra Kavatha; Helen Giamarellou; Zoe Alexiou; Nickolas Vlachogiannis; Stavroula Pentea; Thomas Gozadinos; Garyphalia Poulakou; Agissilaos Hatzipapas; George Koratzanis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of newer cephalosporins.

Authors:  M E Klepser; M N Marangos; K B Patel; D P Nicolau; R Quintiliani; C H Nightingale
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  In vitro activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with other oral beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  F H Kayser
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 6.  Cefpodoxime proxetil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  J E Frampton; R N Brogden; H D Langtry; M M Buckley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.