Literature DB >> 18003651

Fortification of selected foodstuffs with folic acid in the UK: consumer research carried out to inform policy recommendations.

Alison Tedstone1, Mark Browne, Lynda Harrop, Claire Vernon, Victoria Page, Jill Swindells, Wendy Hayward, Jeannette Croft, Freda Harris, Lynn Stockley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The UK Food Standards Agency Board identified four options to increase folate intake in women of reproductive age in order to reduce the risk of neural tube defect (NTD) affected pregnancies; these ranged from continuing with current policy, to mandatory fortification of bread or flour with folic acid. In order to appraise these options, the agency carried out a consultation, and also commissioned four pieces of research. This paper provides detailed information about two of the research studies, which used qualitative research approaches to gather consumer evidence.
METHODS: Study 1: This was carried out with people from a wide range of demographic backgrounds. A 'reconvened group' methodology was used, with five groups convened twice, in five geographical locations. In addition paired, in depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with female black and ethnic minority consumers. Study 2: This was carried out with young mothers living in deprived communities. The approach used for this study was in depth face-to-face interviews (n = 24). In addition, discussions were held in seven friendship groups.
RESULTS: Study 1: only a minority of participants knew about a link between spina bifida and folic acid, and these tended to be women with young families. After the provision of some information about the causes and impacts of NTDs, the majority were in favour of action to tackle the issue. Support for mandatory fortification increased considerably during the study, and at the final discussion, this option was most preferred. Study 2: In this group, there was a fatalistic approach to pregnancy and to health. The women were less likely to change established habits if this required effort, money or doing something unfamiliar. They tended to actively avoid thinking about risks, by rationalizing them. Mandatory fortification was preferred by the majority of respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: In this research, mandatory fortification was the preferred option. There were outstanding concerns about risk, and the maintenance of consumer choice, which would need to be addressed in policy recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18003651     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  4 in total

Review 1.  In utero intervention for urologic diseases.

Authors:  Douglass B Clayton; John W Brock
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Factors contributing to the success of folic acid public health campaigns.

Authors:  D Rofail; A Colligs; L Abetz; M Lindemann; L Maguire
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Why do women invest in pre-pregnancy health and care? A qualitative investigation with women attending maternity services.

Authors:  Geraldine Barrett; Jill Shawe; Beth Howden; Dilisha Patel; Obiamaka Ojukwu; Pranav Pandya; Judith Stephenson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Knowledge and periconceptional use of folic acid for the prevention of neural tube defects in ethnic communities in the United Kingdom: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jordana N Peake; Andrew J Copp; Jill Shawe
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.