Literature DB >> 1800326

Improved methods for determining vitamin A status.

B Sivakumar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1800326     DOI: 10.1007/BF02750923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  A modified relative dose-response assay employing 3,4-didehydroretinol (vitamin A2) in rats.

Authors:  S A Tanumihardjo; J A Olson
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Conjunctival impression cytology for assessment of vitamin A status.

Authors:  V Reddy; V Rao; M Reddy
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Detection of early xerophthalmia by impression cytology.

Authors:  J R Wittpenn; S C Tseng; A Sommer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-02

4.  Relation of the relative dose response to liver concentrations of vitamin A in generally well-nourished surgical patients.

Authors:  O Amédée-Manesme; D Anderson; J A Olson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Protein-energy malnutrition and liver dysfunction limit the usefulness of the relative dose response (RDR) test for predicting vitamin A deficiency.

Authors:  R M Russell; F L Iber; S D Krasinski; P Miller
Journal:  Hum Nutr Clin Nutr       Date:  1983-09

6.  Assessment of marginal vitamin A deficiency in Brazilian children using the relative dose response procedure.

Authors:  H Flores; F Campos; R C Araujo; B A Underwood
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) to detect subclinical vitamin A deficiency: comparison of CIC with biochemical assessments.

Authors:  A M Gadomski; C L Kjolhede; J Wittpenn; J Bulux; A R Rosas; M R Forman
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.045

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.