Literature DB >> 18001756

Comparison between the loading capacities of columns packed with partially and totally porous fine particles. What is the effective surface area available for adsorption?

Fabrice Gritti1, Georges Guiochon.   

Abstract

The adsorption isotherms of phenol, caffeine, insulin, and lysozyme were measured on two C(18)-bonded silica columns. The first one was packed with classical totally porous particles (3 microm Luna(2)-C(18)from Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), the second one with shell particles (2.7 microm Halo-C(18) from Advanced Materials Technology, Wilmington, DE, USA). The measurements were made at room temperature (T=295+/-1K), using mainly frontal analysis (FA) and also elution by characteristic points (FACP) when necessary. The adsorption energy distributions (AEDs) were estimated by the iterative numerical expectation-maximization (EM) procedure and served to justify the choice of the best adsorption isotherm model for each compound. The best isotherm parameters were derived from either the best fit of the experimental data to a multi-Langmuir isotherm model (MLRA) or from the AED results (equilibrium constants and saturation capacities), when the convergence of the EM program was achieved. The experiments show than the loading capacity of the Luna column is more than twice that of the Halo column for low-molecular-weight compounds. This result was expected; it is in good agreement with the values of the accessible surface area of these two materials, which were calculated from the pore size volume distributions. The pore size volume distributions are validated by the excellent agreement between the calculated and measured exclusion volumes of polystyrene standards by inverse size exclusion chromatography (ISEC). In contrast, the loading capacity ratio of the two columns is 1.5 or less with insulin and lysozyme. This is due to a significant exclusion of these two proteins from the internal pore volumes of the two packing materials. This result raises the problem of the determination of the effective surface area of the packing material, particularly in the case of proteins. This area is about 40 and 30% of the total surface area for insulin and for lysozyme, respectively, based on the pore size volume distribution validated by the ISEC method. The ISEC experiments showed that the largest and the smallest mesopores have rather a cylindrical and a spherical shape, respectively, for both packing materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18001756     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  6 in total

1.  Fast high performance liquid chromatography separations for proteomic applications using Fused-Core® silica particles.

Authors:  Stephanie A Schuster; Barry E Boyes; Brian M Wagner; Joseph J Kirkland
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Anti-Metastatic and Anti-Angiogenic Activities of Core-Shell SiO2@LDH Loaded with Etoposide in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yanjing Zhu; Rongrong Zhu; Mei Wang; Bin Wu; Xiaolie He; Yechang Qian; Shilong Wang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  Reversed-phase fused-core HPLC modeling of peptides.

Authors:  Matthias D'Hondt; Bert Gevaert; Sofie Stalmans; Sylvia Van Dorpe; Evelien Wynendaele; Kathelijne Peremans; Christian Burvenich; Bart De Spiegeleer
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2012-11-30

Review 4.  Different Stationary Phase Selectivities and Morphologies for Intact Protein Separations.

Authors:  A Astefanei; I Dapic; M Camenzuli
Journal:  Chromatographia       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.044

5.  One-Step Purification of Microbially Produced Hydrophobic Terpenes via Process Chromatography.

Authors:  Ljubomir Grozdev; Johann Kaiser; Sonja Berensmeier
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-29

6.  Importance of Particle Pore Size in Determining Retention and Selectivity in Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Justin M Godinho; Joseph A Naese; Alexander E Toler; Barry E Boyes; Richard A Henry; Joseph J DeStefano; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.759

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.