BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the effects of supraclavicular fossa radiation on the carotid artery are not well described. In the current study, the authors performed a prospective study to examine the long-term risk of carotid artery stenosis after supraclavicular irradiation for breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 46 breast cancer patients who were treated with adjuvant radiation to the supraclavicular fossa with >8 years of follow-up underwent bilateral Doppler imaging of the carotid artery. Two independent cardiologists interpreted each ultrasound study with no knowledge of which side was treated. RESULTS: The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 14.6 years and the mean patient age at the time of ultrasound was 55 years. The median prescribed dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 50 grays. Four patients were found to have clinically relevant, asymptomatic carotid stenosis, for which a cardiology referral was necessary. Only 1 of these 4 patients had stenosis involving the irradiated carotid artery only; 1 patient had bilateral stenosis and 2 patients had only contralateral stenosis. There was no difference noted with regard to isolated ipsilateral versus contralateral medial intimal thickening of the carotid artery (5 patients vs 6 patients, respectively). Furthermore, there were no differences noted with regard to ipsilateral versus contralateral peak systolic flow in the internal (83.5 vs 85.6 cm/seconds; P= .522 by the Student t test and P= .871 by the signed rank test) or common (74.4 vs 77.0 cm/seconds; P= .462 by the Student t test and P= .246 by the signed rank test) carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study of breast cancer patients with long follow-up, there was no evidence of late, clinically relevant stenosis, increased intimal thickening, or increased peak systolic carotid artery flow secondary to supraclavicular irradiation.
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the effects of supraclavicular fossa radiation on the carotid artery are not well described. In the current study, the authors performed a prospective study to examine the long-term risk of carotid artery stenosis after supraclavicular irradiation for breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 46 breast cancerpatients who were treated with adjuvant radiation to the supraclavicular fossa with >8 years of follow-up underwent bilateral Doppler imaging of the carotid artery. Two independent cardiologists interpreted each ultrasound study with no knowledge of which side was treated. RESULTS: The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 14.6 years and the mean patient age at the time of ultrasound was 55 years. The median prescribed dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 50 grays. Four patients were found to have clinically relevant, asymptomatic carotid stenosis, for which a cardiology referral was necessary. Only 1 of these 4 patients had stenosis involving the irradiated carotid artery only; 1 patient had bilateral stenosis and 2 patients had only contralateral stenosis. There was no difference noted with regard to isolated ipsilateral versus contralateral medial intimal thickening of the carotid artery (5 patients vs 6 patients, respectively). Furthermore, there were no differences noted with regard to ipsilateral versus contralateral peak systolic flow in the internal (83.5 vs 85.6 cm/seconds; P= .522 by the Student t test and P= .871 by the signed rank test) or common (74.4 vs 77.0 cm/seconds; P= .462 by the Student t test and P= .246 by the signed rank test) carotid artery. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study of breast cancerpatients with long follow-up, there was no evidence of late, clinically relevant stenosis, increased intimal thickening, or increased peak systolic carotid artery flow secondary to supraclavicular irradiation.
Authors: M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Wendy A Woodward; Sharon H Giordano; Zhigang Duan; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lucille D A Dorresteijn; Arnoud C Kappelle; Willem Boogerd; Willem J Klokman; Alfons J M Balm; Ronald B Keus; Flora E van Leeuwen; Harry Bartelink Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maartje J Hooning; Lucille D A Dorresteijn; Berthe M P Aleman; Arnoud C Kappelle; Jan G M Klijn; Willem Boogerd; Flora E van Leeuwen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria Elena Gianicolo; Emilio Antonio Luca Gianicolo; Francesco Tramacere; Maria Grazia Andreassi; Maurizio Portaluri Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 2.062