Literature DB >> 18000658

The conscientious judgement of a DSMB--statistical stopping rules re-examined.

Karin Hedenmalm1, Hans Melander, Gunnar Alvan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the light of the recent failure of a large cardiovascular mortality and morbidity study with torcetrapib, we have undertaken a post hoc review of the decisions taken by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) in that study. A number of other studies in which complex decisions were made by DSMBs are also reviewed.
RESULTS: The examples illustrate the complexities involved in the decision-making process by DSMBs and indicate that too much reliance on formal statistical stopping rules should be avoided due to a risk of delaying the identification of an unacceptable emergent safety signal.
METHODS: The review was based on information submitted by the sponsors of the studies to the Medical Products Agency.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple approaches to assessing the efficacy and safety in clinical trials need to be considered in order to facilitate early stopping of clinical trials with a negative risk benefit balance. Such systems may, for example, include the use of p-value flags and/or a complementary statistical analysis of the likelihood of achieving the study objective based on the data obtained to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18000658     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-007-0403-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  9 in total

Review 1.  The agonising negative trend in monitoring of clinical trials.

Authors:  D L DeMets; S J Pocock; D G Julian
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-12-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Clinical research. Lessons from a failed drug trial.

Authors:  Eliot Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Early termination of drug trials.

Authors:  Gorm Boje Jensen; John Hampton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-17

4.  An increased coronary risk is paradoxically associated with common cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene variations that relate to higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a population-based study.

Authors:  Susanna E Borggreve; Hans L Hillege; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Paul E de Jong; Mike W Zuurman; Gerrit van der Steege; Arie van Tol; Robin P F Dullaart
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Association of cholesteryl ester transfer protein-TaqIB polymorphism with variations in lipoprotein subclasses and coronary heart disease risk: the Framingham study.

Authors:  J M Ordovas; L A Cupples; D Corella; J D Otvos; D Osgood; A Martinez; C Lahoz; O Coltell; P W Wilson; E J Schaefer
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Genetic cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiency is extremely frequent in the Omagari area of Japan. Marked hyperalphalipoproteinemia caused by CETP gene mutation is not associated with longevity.

Authors:  K Hirano; S Yamashita; N Nakajima; T Arai; T Maruyama; Y Yoshida; M Ishigami; N Sakai; K Kameda-Takemura; Y Matsuzawa
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  Increased coronary heart disease in Japanese-American men with mutation in the cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene despite increased HDL levels.

Authors:  S Zhong; D S Sharp; J S Grove; C Bruce; K Yano; J D Curb; A R Tall
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; Kathy Wolski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Natural genetic variation as a tool in understanding the role of CETP in lipid levels and disease.

Authors:  S Matthijs Boekholdt; John F Thompson
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2003-03-16       Impact factor: 5.922

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of safety monitoring on the efficacy analysis in large Phase III group sequential trials with non-trivial safety event rate.

Authors:  Yanqiu Weng; Yuko Y Palesch; Stacia M DeSantis; Wenle Zhao
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 2.  Systematic review of safety in paediatric drug trials published in 2007.

Authors:  Khairun Nain Bin Nor Aripin; Imti Choonara; Helen M Sammons
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 2.953

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.