OBJECTIVE: To examine the beliefs and attitudes of FPs and health care professionals (HCPs) regarding FPs' roles and responsibilities on interdisciplinary geriatric health care teams. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Calgary Health Region. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen FPs and 22 HCPs working on geriatric health care teams. METHOD: Four 90-minute focus groups were conducted with FPs, followed by 2 additional 90-minute focus groups with HCPs. The FP focus groups discussed 4 vignettes of typical teamwork scenarios. Discussions were transcribed and the 4 researchers analyzed and coded themes and subthemes and developed the HCP focus group questions. These questions asked about HCPs' expectations of FPs on teams, experiences with FPs on teams, and perspectives on optimal roles on teams. Several meetings were held to determine themes and subthemes. MAIN FINDINGS: Family physicians identified patient centredness, role delineation for team members, team dynamics, and team structure as critical to team success. Both FPs and HCPs had a continuum of beliefs about the role FPs should play on teams, including whether FPs should be autonomous or collaborative decision makers, the extent to which FPs should work within or outside teams, whether FPs should be leaders or simply members of teams, and the level of responsibility implied or explicit in their roles. CONCLUSION: Comments from FPs and HCPs identified intraprofessional and interprofessional tensions that could affect team practice and impede the development of high-functioning teams. It will be important, as primary care reform continues, to help FPs and HCPs learn how to work together effectively on teams so that patients receive the best possible care.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the beliefs and attitudes of FPs and health care professionals (HCPs) regarding FPs' roles and responsibilities on interdisciplinary geriatric health care teams. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Calgary Health Region. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen FPs and 22 HCPs working on geriatric health care teams. METHOD: Four 90-minute focus groups were conducted with FPs, followed by 2 additional 90-minute focus groups with HCPs. The FP focus groups discussed 4 vignettes of typical teamwork scenarios. Discussions were transcribed and the 4 researchers analyzed and coded themes and subthemes and developed the HCP focus group questions. These questions asked about HCPs' expectations of FPs on teams, experiences with FPs on teams, and perspectives on optimal roles on teams. Several meetings were held to determine themes and subthemes. MAIN FINDINGS: Family physicians identified patient centredness, role delineation for team members, team dynamics, and team structure as critical to team success. Both FPs and HCPs had a continuum of beliefs about the role FPs should play on teams, including whether FPs should be autonomous or collaborative decision makers, the extent to which FPs should work within or outside teams, whether FPs should be leaders or simply members of teams, and the level of responsibility implied or explicit in their roles. CONCLUSION: Comments from FPs and HCPs identified intraprofessional and interprofessional tensions that could affect team practice and impede the development of high-functioning teams. It will be important, as primary care reform continues, to help FPs and HCPs learn how to work together effectively on teams so that patients receive the best possible care.
Authors: David B Preen; Belinda E S Bailey; Alan Wright; Peter Kendall; Martin Phillips; Joseph Hung; Randall Hendriks; Annette Mather; Elizabeth Williams Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Rosanne M Leipzig; Kathryn Hyer; Kirsten Ek; Sylvan Wallenstein; Maria L Vezina; Susan Fairchild; Christine K Cassel; Judith L Howe Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Danielle F Loeb; Erin Leister; Evette Ludman; Ingrid A Binswanger; Lori Crane; Miriam Dickinson; Danielle M Kline; Frank V deGruy; Donald Nease; Elizabeth A Bayliss Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Danielle F Loeb; Samantha Pelican Monson; Steven Lockhart; Cori Depue; Evette Ludman; Donald E Nease; Ingrid A Binswanger; Danielle M Kline; Frank V de Gruy; Dixie G Good; Elizabeth A Bayliss Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Danielle F Loeb; Danielle M Kline; Kurt Kroenke; Cynthia Boyd; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Evette Ludman; L Miriam Dickinson; Ingrid A Binswanger; Samantha P Monson Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 2.497