OBJECTIVE: To analyze and adapt a set of quality indicators for assessment and management of patients with cognitive disorders, which are seen very frequently in geriatric assessment units in Quebec. DESIGN: Modified Delphi technique. SETTING: Province of Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Seven clinicians from 3 different medical faculties in Quebec were selected for their expertise in dementia and geriatric care. METHOD: From among the indicators developed in 2001 using the RAND method, 22 items selected for their relevance to evaluation and management of cognitive disorders were adapted to clinical practice in the Quebec hospital system. These indicators, along with evidence from the literature, were submitted by mail to a panel of experts. The experts were asked to rate, on a scale of 1 to 9, their level of agreement with the indicators in terms of their validity and quality and the need for them to be recorded in patients' medical charts. For an indicator to be retained, it had to be accepted according to its median value, to be rated in the upper third of the scale, and to be approved by the panelists. Indicators not accepted at first were modified according to experts' comments and then re-submitted to the same panel for a second round. RESULTS: Of 22 indicators submitted in the first round, 21 were validated. They covered assessment, investigation, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up. The indicator found questionable was modified and then accepted during the second round. CONCLUSION: This study identified 22 indicators relevant to assessment and management of patients with cognitive disorders in geriatric assessment units. These indicators will serve as a basis for evaluation of dementia in a larger study of the quality of care in all short-term geriatric assessment units in Quebec.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and adapt a set of quality indicators for assessment and management of patients with cognitive disorders, which are seen very frequently in geriatric assessment units in Quebec. DESIGN: Modified Delphi technique. SETTING: Province of Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Seven clinicians from 3 different medical faculties in Quebec were selected for their expertise in dementia and geriatric care. METHOD: From among the indicators developed in 2001 using the RAND method, 22 items selected for their relevance to evaluation and management of cognitive disorders were adapted to clinical practice in the Quebec hospital system. These indicators, along with evidence from the literature, were submitted by mail to a panel of experts. The experts were asked to rate, on a scale of 1 to 9, their level of agreement with the indicators in terms of their validity and quality and the need for them to be recorded in patients' medical charts. For an indicator to be retained, it had to be accepted according to its median value, to be rated in the upper third of the scale, and to be approved by the panelists. Indicators not accepted at first were modified according to experts' comments and then re-submitted to the same panel for a second round. RESULTS: Of 22 indicators submitted in the first round, 21 were validated. They covered assessment, investigation, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up. The indicator found questionable was modified and then accepted during the second round. CONCLUSION: This study identified 22 indicators relevant to assessment and management of patients with cognitive disorders in geriatric assessment units. These indicators will serve as a basis for evaluation of dementia in a larger study of the quality of care in all short-term geriatric assessment units in Quebec.
Authors: R S Doody; J C Stevens; C Beck; R M Dubinsky; J A Kaye; L Gwyther; R C Mohs; L J Thal; P J Whitehouse; S T DeKosky; J L Cummings Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-05-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C Patterson; S Gauthier; H Bergman; C Cohen; J W Feightner; H Feldman; A Grek; D B Hogan Journal: Can J Neurol Sci Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: D S Knopman; S T DeKosky; J L Cummings; H Chui; J Corey-Bloom; N Relkin; G W Small; B Miller; J C Stevens Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-05-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Joshua Chodosh; Diana B Petitti; Marc Elliott; Ron D Hays; Valerie C Crooks; David B Reuben; J Galen Buckwalter; Neil Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Caroline A Brand; Melinda Martin-Khan; Olivia Wright; Richard N Jones; John N Morris; Catherine M Travers; Joannne Tropea; Leonard C Gray Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 2.655