OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors (i.e. experience of crime, nuisance from neighbours, drug misuse, youngsters frequently hanging around, rubbish on the streets, feeling unsafe and dissatisfaction with the quality of green space) and self-rated health in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 2914 subjects aged > or = 18 years from 75 neighbourhoods in the city of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Individual data from the Social State of Amsterdam Survey 2004 were linked to data on neighbourhood-level attributes from the Amsterdam Living and Security Survey 2003. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and neighbourhood-level variance. RESULTS: Fair to poor self-rated health was significantly associated with neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors: nuisance from neighbours, drug misuse, youngsters frequently hanging around, rubbish on the streets, feeling unsafe and dissatisfaction with green space. In addition, when all the neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors were combined, individuals from neighbourhoods with a high score of psychosocial stressors were more likely than those from neighbourhoods with a low score to report fair to poor health. These associations remained after adjustments for individual-level factors (i.e. age, sex, educational level, income and ethnicity). The neighbourhood-level variance showed significant differences in self-rated health between neighbourhoods independent of individual-level demographic and socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors are associated with self-rated health. Strategies that target these factors might prove a promising way to improve public health.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors (i.e. experience of crime, nuisance from neighbours, drug misuse, youngsters frequently hanging around, rubbish on the streets, feeling unsafe and dissatisfaction with the quality of green space) and self-rated health in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 2914 subjects aged > or = 18 years from 75 neighbourhoods in the city of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Individual data from the Social State of Amsterdam Survey 2004 were linked to data on neighbourhood-level attributes from the Amsterdam Living and Security Survey 2003. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and neighbourhood-level variance. RESULTS: Fair to poor self-rated health was significantly associated with neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors: nuisance from neighbours, drug misuse, youngsters frequently hanging around, rubbish on the streets, feeling unsafe and dissatisfaction with green space. In addition, when all the neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors were combined, individuals from neighbourhoods with a high score of psychosocial stressors were more likely than those from neighbourhoods with a low score to report fair to poor health. These associations remained after adjustments for individual-level factors (i.e. age, sex, educational level, income and ethnicity). The neighbourhood-level variance showed significant differences in self-rated health between neighbourhoods independent of individual-level demographic and socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that neighbourhood-level psychosocial stressors are associated with self-rated health. Strategies that target these factors might prove a promising way to improve public health.
Authors: John Lynch; George Davey Smith; Sam Harper; Marianne Hillemeier; Nancy Ross; George A Kaplan; Michael Wolfson Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Charles C Branas; Rose A Cheney; John M MacDonald; Vicky W Tam; Tara D Jackson; Thomas R Ten Have Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Shannon N Zenk; Barbara A Israel; Graciela Mentz; Carmen Stokes; Sandro Galea Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Polina Putrik; Nanne K de Vries; Suhreta Mujakovic; Ludovic van Amelsvoort; Ijmert Kant; Anton E Kunst; Hans van Oers; Maria Jansen Journal: J Community Health Date: 2015-02
Authors: Andrew G Rundle; Michael D M Bader; Catherine A Richards; Kathryn M Neckerman; Julien O Teitler Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Stephanie Brooks Holliday; Wendy Troxel; Ann Haas; Madhumita Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Rebecca Collins; Robin Beckman; Matthew Baird; Tamara Dubowitz Journal: Health Place Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Kim de Jong; Maria Albin; Erik Skärbäck; Patrik Grahn; John Wadbro; Juan Merlo; Jonas Björk Journal: Environ Health Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Shanley Chong; Elizabeth Lobb; Rabia Khan; Hisham Abu-Rayya; Roy Byun; Bin Jalaludin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 3.295