Literature DB >> 18000109

Applications submitted and grants awarded to men and women in nationwide biomedical competitive research, in 2006, in Spain.

Rosana Peiró-Pérez1, Concha Colomer-Revuelta, Margarita Blázquez-Herranz, Fernando Gómez-López.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to European reports, women participate in research less than men, especially in positions of responsibility. This kind of analysis has not been carried out in Spain in the field of biomedical research. This study describes participation of men and women as grant applicants in two different calls for research funding, held in Spain in 2006.
METHODS: Data collected from grant applicants and from grantees, for two different competitive grant researches areas: human resources and CIBER (Spanish acronym for Biomedical Research Network Centres) have been described by sex.
RESULTS: The human resources call shows that the number of applications submitted by women is higher (67.8% vs 32.2%), but the percentage of awards are similar (20.3% vs 22.7%), OR = 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82 to 1.62), with no statistical differences, although there are more men in the upper categories (superior technical experts (OR = 1.19 (0.58 to 2.45)) post-doctoral (OR = 1.36 (0.65 to 2.86)) and research personnel (OR = 1.48 (0.67 to 3.25)). With the CIBER call (senior researchers) there is a clear difference in the number of applicants (women 19.6%, men 80.4%) but the number of awardees is similar (40.3% vs 43.1%) OR = 0.89 (0.65 to 1.34).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there are no statistical differences between women and men, with respect the awards obtained, there is a different pattern to the type of grant application, with fewer women in the more senior call.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18000109      PMCID: PMC2465766          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2007.067413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  4 in total

1.  The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Elizabeth A Guancial; Cynthia Cooper Worobey; Lori E Henault; Yuchiao Chang; Rebecca Starr; Nancy J Tarbell; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Promoting the career development of women in academic medicine.

Authors:  Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-26

3.  Women in hospital medicine in the United Kingdom: glass ceiling, preference, prejudice or cohort effect?

Authors:  I C McManus; K A Sproston
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Is there a sex bias in choosing editors? Epidemiology journals as an example.

Authors:  K Dickersin; L Fredman; K M Flegal; J D Scott; B Crawley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Engendering epidemiology.

Authors:  Ana M García; Mel Bartley; Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Features of successful bids for funding of applied health research: a cohort study.

Authors:  Sheila Turner; Peter Davidson; Louise Stanton; Victoria Cawdeary
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2014-09-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.