Literature DB >> 17999820

Study to assess differences in outcome following open carpal tunnel decompressions performed by surgeons of differing grade.

S Akhtar1, S Sinha, M J Bradley, F D Burke, S E F Wilgis, N H Dubin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel decompression is the most commonly performed surgical procedure within a hand unit. Although very effective, the complications following the procedure can be significant. In an attempt to identify the causes of such complications, we assessed whether seniority of the surgeon impacts on outcome for open carpal tunnel decompression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were jointly and prospectively gathered from two units from either side of the Atlantic - the Pulvertaft Hand Center, UK and the Curtis Hand Center, USA. The aim of the study was to assess outcome following carpal tunnel decompression. Completed data were gathered following open carpal tunnel decompression on 352 hands. Surgeons of a consultant grade had performed 123 of these procedures whilst surgical trainees had performed 229 of the procedures. Assessment was by Levine Katz questionnaire results, Semmes-Weinstein testing, grip strength and pinch grip strength testing performed both pre-operatively and 6 months' postoperatively. Complications following the procedure were also recorded.
RESULTS: Mean results were found to be better in those patients where the surgeon was of a consultant grade. However, this was only found to be of statistical significance on Semmes-Weinstein testing. Complications following the procedure were also noted to be higher in the group of patients operated on by trainee grades.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the carpal tunnel decompression performed by a surgeon of consultant grade offers slightly better results in objective neurological testing when compared with those performed by a more junior grade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17999820      PMCID: PMC2173181          DOI: 10.1308/003588407X232035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  Roughness discrimination after penetrating brain injury in man: analysis according to locus of lesion.

Authors:  S WEINSTEIN; J SEMMES; L GHENT; H L TEUBER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-06

2.  Nerve fibre composition of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve and clinical implications.

Authors:  U Ahcan; Z M Arnez; F F Bajrović; A Hvala; P Zorman
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2003-12

3.  Late complications after open carpal tunnel decompression.

Authors:  W Kluge; R G Simpson; A C Nicol
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1996-04

4.  A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  D W Levine; B P Simmons; M J Koris; L H Daltroy; G G Hohl; A H Fossel; J N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Complications of carpal tunnel surgery.

Authors:  D S Louis; T L Greene; R C Noellert
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods.

Authors:  R A Brown; R H Gelberman; J G Seiler; S O Abrahamsson; A J Weiland; J R Urbaniak; D A Schoenfeld; D Furcolo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  R I MacDonald; D M Lichtman; J J Hanlon; J N Wilson
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.230

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Carpal tunnel release in patients with diabetes result in poorer outcome in long-term study.

Authors:  Deniz Gulabi; Gultekin Cecen; Bulent Guclu; Aycicek Cecen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-20

2.  The dose-dependent efficiency of radial shock wave therapy for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ming-Jen Ke; Liang-Cheng Chen; Yu-Ching Chou; Tsung-Ying Li; Heng-Yi Chu; Chia-Kuang Tsai; Yung-Tsan Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.