Literature DB >> 17999408

Does single umbilical artery (SUA) predict any type of congenital defect? Clinical-epidemiological analysis of a large consecutive series of malformed infants.

María Luisa Martínez-Frías1, Eva Bermejo, Elvira Rodríguez-Pinilla, David Prieto.   

Abstract

Most studies associating different types of malformations with the presence of a single umbilical artery (SUA) are based on small and selected series. Here, we present the results of a study aimed at identifying the most frequent, and the most specific anomalies related to SUA. We analyzed 19,909 consecutive newborn infants with congenital malformations, from the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECEMC). To estimate the specificity of the relationship of different congenital defects with SUA, we calculated their relative frequencies (RF) by dividing their frequency in infants with SUA by the corresponding frequency in newborn infants without SUA. Using the different levels of the ECEMC coding system, we calculated the RFs in three steps: (a) a group of individual congenital defects, (b) different groups of malformed infants, and (c) each individual malformation by its clinical presentation in some of the studied groups of malformed infants. The defects most specifically associated with SUA were bilateral renal agenesis and imperforate anus, followed by unilateral renal agenesis, and vertebral defects, the RF of which indicated that they were between 7.99 and 9.93 times more frequent among malformed infants with SUA than among malformed infants without SUA. However, these defects were not as frequent in the group of infants with SUA, as cardiovascular anomalies. Regarding the association of SUA in the groups of malformed infants, the most specific groups were body stalk defects and sirenomelia. Finally, we analyzed the association of the individual defects by different groups of malformed infants in order to identify if the individual defects are associated with SUA in any type of clinical presentation, and in relation to some groups of infants with genetic disorders. The results, together with the embryonic development of the umbilical cord, strongly suggest that not all cases of SUA have the same cause, and that all previously suggested mechanisms may be possible but with different frequencies. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17999408     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  8 in total

Review 1.  Sirenomelia: an epidemiologic study in a large dataset from the International Clearinghouse of Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and literature review.

Authors:  Iêda M Orioli; Emmanuelle Amar; Jazmin Arteaga-Vazquez; Marian K Bakker; Sebastiano Bianca; Lorenzo D Botto; Maurizio Clementi; Adolfo Correa; Melinda Csaky-Szunyogh; Emanuele Leoncini; Zhu Li; Jorge S López-Camelo; R Brian Lowry; Lisa Marengo; María-Luisa Martínez-Frías; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Margery Morgan; Anna Pierini; Annukka Ritvanen; Gioacchino Scarano; Elena Szabova; Eduardo E Castilla
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 2.  An epigenetic association of malformations, adverse reproductive outcomes, and fetal origins hypothesis related effects.

Authors:  Mark Lubinsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Sirenomelia: two cases in Cali, Colombia.

Authors:  Wilmar Saldarriaga; Maria Jimena Salcedo-Arellano; Julian Ramirez-Cheyne
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-30

Review 4.  Congenital abnormalities of the urogenital tract: the clue is in the cord?

Authors:  Ahmed Daoub; Thomas M Drake
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-12-02

5.  Postnatal development of fetuses with a single umbilical artery: differences between malformed and non-malformed infants.

Authors:  Jose Vicente Arcos-Machancoses; Purificación Marín-Reina; Eugenia Romaguera-Salort; Yolanda García-Camuñas; Antonio Pérez-Aytés; Máximo Vento
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.764

6.  Anatomical variations of medial umbilical ligament: clinical significance in laparoscopic exploration of children.

Authors:  Baran Tokar; Ferruh Yucel
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Sirenomelia phenotype in bmp7;shh compound mutants: a novel experimental model for studies of caudal body malformations.

Authors:  Carlos Garrido-Allepuz; Domingo González-Lamuño; Maria A Ros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A clinical and experimental overview of sirenomelia: insight into the mechanisms of congenital limb malformations.

Authors:  Carlos Garrido-Allepuz; Endika Haro; Domingo González-Lamuño; María Luisa Martínez-Frías; Federica Bertocchini; Maria A Ros
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.758

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.