Literature DB >> 17999182

An extended random-effects approach to modeling repeated, overdispersed count data.

Geert Molenberghs1, Geert Verbeke, Clarice G B Demétrio.   

Abstract

Non-Gaussian outcomes are often modeled using members of the so-called exponential family. The Poisson model for count data falls within this tradition. The family in general, and the Poisson model in particular, are at the same time convenient since mathematically elegant, but in need of extension since often somewhat restrictive. Two of the main rationales for existing extensions are (1) the occurrence of overdispersion, in the sense that the variability in the data is not adequately captured by the model's prescribed mean-variance link, and (2) the accommodation of data hierarchies owing to, for example, repeatedly measuring the outcome on the same subject, recording information from various members of the same family, etc. There is a variety of overdispersion models for count data, such as, for example, the negative-binomial model. Hierarchies are often accommodated through the inclusion of subject-specific, random effects. Though not always, one conventionally assumes such random effects to be normally distributed. While both of these issues may occur simultaneously, models accommodating them at once are less than common. This paper proposes a generalized linear model, accommodating overdispersion and clustering through two separate sets of random effects, of gamma and normal type, respectively. This is in line with the proposal by Booth et al. (Stat Model 3:179-181, 2003). The model extends both classical overdispersion models for count data (Breslow, Appl Stat 33:38-44, 1984), in particular the negative binomial model, as well as the generalized linear mixed model (Breslow and Clayton, J Am Stat Assoc 88:9-25, 1993). Apart from model formulation, we briefly discuss several estimation options, and then settle for maximum likelihood estimation with both fully analytic integration as well as hybrid between analytic and numerical integration. The latter is implemented in the SAS procedure NLMIXED. The methodology is applied to data from a study in epileptic seizures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17999182     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-007-9064-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  3 in total

1.  A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linear models.

Authors:  M Aitkin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Some covariance models for longitudinal count data with overdispersion.

Authors:  P F Thall; S C Vail
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Topiramate placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial in refractory partial epilepsy using 200-, 400-, and 600-mg daily dosages. Topiramate YD Study Group.

Authors:  E Faught; B J Wilder; R E Ramsay; R A Reife; L D Kramer; G W Pledger; R M Karim
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.910

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Charges for Alcoholic Cirrhosis Exceed All Other Etiologies of Cirrhosis Combined: A National and State Inpatient Survey Analysis.

Authors:  A Sidney Barritt; Yue Jiang; Monica Schmidt; Paul H Hayashi; Ramon Bataller
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  A big data approach to the development of mixed-effects models for seizure count data.

Authors:  Joseph J Tharayil; Sharon Chiang; Robert Moss; John M Stern; William H Theodore; Daniel M Goldenholz
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.864

3.  Menstrual Cycle Hormone Changes in Women Traversing Menopause: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Nanette Santoro; Sybil L Crawford; Samar R El Khoudary; Amanda A Allshouse; Sherri-Ann Burnett-Bowie; Joel Finkelstein; Carol Derby; Karen Matthews; Howard M Kravitz; Sioban D Harlow; Gail A Greendale; Ellen B Gold; Rasa Kazlauskaite; Dan McConnell; Genevieve Neal-Perry; Jelena Pavlovic; John Randolph; Gerson Weiss; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Bill Lasley
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Natural variability in seizure frequency: Implications for trials and placebo.

Authors:  Juan Romero; Phil Larimer; Bernard Chang; Shira R Goldenholz; Daniel M Goldenholz
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 5.  Methodological quality and reporting of generalized linear mixed models in clinical medicine (2000-2012): a systematic review.

Authors:  Martí Casals; Montserrat Girabent-Farrés; Josep L Carrasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reference effect measures for quantifying, comparing and visualizing variation from random and fixed effects in non-normal multilevel models, with applications to site variation in medical procedure use and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas J Glorioso; Gary K Grunwald; P Michael Ho; Thomas M Maddox
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated-measurement multivariate count data.

Authors:  Ivonne Martin; Hae-Won Uh; Taniawati Supali; Makedonka Mitreva; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Progression of HIV Disease Among Patients on ART in Ethiopia: Application of Longitudinal Count Models.

Authors:  Belay Desyebelew Andualem; Birhanu Teshome Ayele
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-02-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.