Literature DB >> 17999127

Open inguinal hernia repair in women: is mesh necessary?

N M Thairu1, B P Heather, J J Earnshaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little information available on recurrence rates following primary open inguinal hernia repair in women. Women are less prone to inguinal hernias than men; for the same reason, recurrences after hernia repair may also be lower so that the well-known advantage of using mesh could be lost on them.
METHOD: Women having primary open inguinal hernia repair under the care of one surgical team were identified from the unit database. Recurrences in those who had non-mesh repair were sought by a combination of a written questionnaire and clinical examination.
RESULTS: Fifty-two women had a non-mesh inguinal hernia repair over a 12-year interval; 37 responded to a questionnaire. There were no major perioperative complications; one recurrence was diagnosed, giving an overall recurrence rate of 2.8% (95% confidence interval 8.2%). During the study interval 37 women had open mesh repair of an inguinal hernia. There were three major complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of mesh for open indirect inguinal hernia repair in women may not be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17999127     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-007-0306-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  14 in total

1.  Inguinal hernia in the female.

Authors:  F GLASSOW
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1963-06

2.  Longterm followup (12-15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  G L Beets; K J Oosterhuis; P M Go; C G Baeten; G Kootstra
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Prospective evaluation of 6895 groin hernia repairs in women.

Authors:  A Koch; A Edwards; S Haapaniemi; P Nordin; A Kald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Inguinal and femoral hernia in women.

Authors:  F Glassow
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1972-01

5.  Inguinal herniorrhaphy in women.

Authors:  Morten Bay-Nielsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Evolution of an inguinal hernia surgery practice.

Authors:  M Mokete; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Randomized trial of modified Bassini versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair. The Cologne Hernia Study Group.

Authors:  A Paul; H Troidl; J I Williams; D Rixen; R Langen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The rational use of mesh in hernias. A perspective.

Authors:  R Bendavid
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec

9.  Non-palpable inguinal hernia in the female.

Authors:  L Spangen; R Andersson; L Ohlsson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

Authors:  N W Scott; K McCormack; P Graham; P M Go; S J Ross; A M Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: A review.

Authors:  Harvinder Singh Pahwa; Awanish Kumar; Prerit Agarwal; Akshay Anand Agarwal
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Pattern of abdominal wall herniae in females: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Olalekan Olasehinde; Amarachukwu C Etonyeaku; Elugwaraonu A Agbakwuru; Ademola O Talabi; Funmilola O Wuraola; Adebayo G Tanimola
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Current options in inguinal hernia repair in adult patients.

Authors:  H Kulacoglu
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.471

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.