Literature DB >> 17998547

Moderators of interventions designed to enhance physical and psychological functioning among younger women with early-stage breast cancer.

Michael F Scheier1, Vicki S Helgeson, Richard Schulz, Suzanne Colvin, Sarah L Berga, Judy Knapp, Kristina Gerszten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify factors that condition or moderate the impact of a previously described set of interventions on psychological and physical adjustment after diagnosis and treatment for early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Younger women (age < 51 years, N = 252) with early-stage breast cancer within 2 months of having completed active nonhormonal adjuvant therapy were randomly assigned to a three-arm clinical trial, consisting of a control arm, an education arm, and a nutrition arm. Primary end points, assessed before random assignment and 4 and 13 months later, included mental functioning, physical functioning, and depressive symptoms. Four types of moderator variables were identified, including two sets reflecting psychosocial resources, specifically personality factors and factors related to the person's social environment, a set reflecting demographic variables, and a set reflecting treatment and disease variables (including comorbidities).
RESULTS: Psychosocial factors were more likely to moderate treatment effects than were demographic and disease-related factors, but the moderating effects of these psychosocial factors were limited to patients receiving the nutrition intervention. Patients with lower psychosocial resources benefited from the nutrition intervention, whereas patients with a greater amount of psychosocial resources did not.
CONCLUSION: Future trials of this type should stratify by or select for the moderating variables identified here (ie, dispositional pessimism, unmitigated communion, and negative social interaction) to establish more firmly their role in responses to psychosocial interventions. Effort should also be made to collect data to inform the delivery of interventions to those who might benefit the most.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17998547     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  24 in total

Review 1.  Who benefits from psychosocial interventions in oncology? A systematic review of psychological moderators of treatment outcome.

Authors:  Rie Tamagawa; Sheila Garland; Marcus Vaska; Linda E Carlson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-01-22

2.  Understanding Symptom Burden in Patients With Advanced Cancer Living in Rural Areas.

Authors:  Stephanie Gilbertson-White; Yelena Perkhounkova; Seyedehtanaz Saeidzadeh; Maria Hein; Rachel Dahl; Andrean Simons-Burnett
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Optimizing a Positive Psychology Intervention to Promote Health Behaviors After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Positive Emotions After Acute Coronary Events III (PEACE-III) Randomized Factorial Trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Celano; Ariana M Albanese; Rachel A Millstein; Carol A Mastromauro; Wei-Jean Chung; Kirsti A Campbell; Sean R Legler; Elyse R Park; Brian C Healy; Linda M Collins; James L Januzzi; Jeff C Huffman
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 4.  Positive Psychological Well-Being and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC Health Promotion Series.

Authors:  Laura D Kubzansky; Jeff C Huffman; Julia K Boehm; Rosalba Hernandez; Eric S Kim; Hayami K Koga; Emily H Feig; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Martin E P Seligman; Darwin R Labarthe
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The Positive Emotions after Acute Coronary Events behavioral health intervention: Design, rationale, and preliminary feasibility of a factorial design study.

Authors:  Jeffery C Huffman; Ariana M Albanese; Kirsti A Campbell; Christopher M Celano; Rachel A Millstein; Carol A Mastromauro; Brian C Healy; Wei-Jean Chung; James L Januzzi; Linda M Collins; Elyse R Park
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Look before you leap: systematic evaluation of tree-based statistical methods in subgroup identification.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xiwen Ma; Donghui Zhang; Lijiang Geng; Xiaojing Wang; Wei Zheng; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  Personality influences quality-of-life assessments in adult patients after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT: results from a joint evaluation of the prospective German Multicenter Validation Trial and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Authors:  P Y Herzberg; S J Lee; P Heussner; F H A Mumm; I Hilgendorf; S von Harsdorf; P Hemmati; K Rieger; H T Greinix; M Freund; E Holler; D Wolff
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  A comparison of two psychological interventions for newly-diagnosed gynecological cancer patients.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Shannon Myers Virtue; Melissa Ozga; Deborah Kashy; Carolyn Heckman; David Kissane; Norman Rosenblum; Mark Morgan; Lorna Rodriquez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Anne Moyer; Sarah Knapp-Oliver; Stephanie Sohl; Dolores Cannella; Valerie Targhetta
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-09-27

10.  The role of the family environment and computer-mediated social support on breast cancer patients' coping strategies.

Authors:  Woohyun Yoo; Dhavan V Shah; Bret R Shaw; Eunkyung Kim; Paul Smaglik; Linda J Roberts; Robert P Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree; Helene McDowell; David H Gustafson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.