Literature DB >> 17998419

Investigations of energy metabolism in weanling barrows: the interaction of dietary energy concentration and daily feed (energy) intake.

T F Oresanya1, A D Beaulieu, J F Patience.   

Abstract

Much of our understanding of energy metabolism in the pig has been derived from studies in which the energy supply was controlled through regulated feed intake. In commercial situations, where ad libitum feeding is practiced, dietary energy concentration, but not daily feed intake, is under producer control. This study evaluated the interactive effects of dietary energy concentration and feeding level (FL) on growth, body composition, and nutrient deposition rates. Individually penned PIC barrows, with an initial BW of 9.5 +/- 1.0 kg, were allotted to 1 of 9 treatments in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement plus an initial slaughter group (n = 6) that was slaughtered at the beginning of the trial. Three NE concentrations (low, 2.15; medium, 2.26; and high, 2.37 Mcal of NE/kg) and 3 feeding levels (FL: 100, 80, or 70% of ad libitum access to feed) were investigated. Daily feed allowance for the restricted-fed pigs was adjusted twice per week on a BW basis until completion of the experiment at 25 +/- 1 kg of BW. Average daily gain, ADFI, and G:F were unaffected by NE (mean = 572 g, 781 g, and 0.732 g/g, respectively). Average daily gain and ADFI, but not G:F, increased (P < 0.05) with FL. Empty body lipid concentration increased with dietary NE concentration and with FL; a significant (P < 0.01) interaction revealed that empty body lipid concentration increased most rapidly as ADFI increased on the highest energy diet. Empty body lipid concentration was greatest in pigs with ad libitum access to the high-NE diet. Empty body protein concentration decreased with increasing NE (P < 0.05) but was not affected by FL. Empty body protein deposition (PD) increased with increasing FL (P < 0.001), but not with NE. Empty body lipid deposition (LD) and the LD:PD ratio increased (P < 0.01) in pigs with ad libitum access to the high-NE diet. In conclusion, NE did not interact with FL on growth, body protein concentration, or PD, suggesting that the conclusions regarding energy utilization obtained from experiments using restricted feed intake may not easily be applied to pigs fed under ad libitum conditions. The interactive effects of NE and FL on body lipid concentration, LD, and the LD:PD ratio indicate that changes in dietary energy concentration alter the composition of gain without necessarily changing overall BW gain. Consequently, the composition of gain is an important outcome in studies on energy utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17998419     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional interventions to alleviate the negative consequences of heat stress.

Authors:  Robert P Rhoads; Lance H Baumgard; Jessica K Suagee; Sara R Sanders
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Effect of feeding restriction on growth and dressing percentages in Mexican hairless pig.

Authors:  L A Rodríguez-González; W Trejo-Lizama; R H Santos-Ricalde
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effect of lower-energy, higher-fiber diets on pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake when fed higher-energy, lower-fiber diets.

Authors:  E D Mauch; J M Young; N V L Serão; W L Hsu; J F Patience; B J Kerr; T E Weber; N K Gabler; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Evaluating phosphorus release by phytase in diets fed to growing pigs that are not deficient in phosphorus.

Authors:  Kristin M Olsen; Stacie A Gould; Carrie L Walk; Nick V L Serão; Stephanie L Hansen; John F Patience
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Application of Genetic, Genomic and Biological Pathways in Improvement of Swine Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Pourya Davoudi; Duy Ngoc Do; Stefanie M Colombo; Bruce Rathgeber; Younes Miar
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Effects of dietary chromium propionate on growth performance, metabolism, and immune biomarkers in heat-stressed finishing pigs1.

Authors:  Edith J Mayorga; Sara K Kvidera; Jacob T Seibert; Erin A Horst; Mohannad Abuajamieh; Mohmmad Al-Qaisi; Samantha Lei; Jason W Ross; Colin D Johnson; Brian Kremer; Luis Ochoa; Robert P Rhoads; Lance H Baumgard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs.

Authors:  D Y Kil; B G Kim; H H Stein
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Estimation of endogenous intestinal losses of acid hydrolyzed ether extract in growing and finishing pigs using the linear regression method.

Authors:  Jesus A Acosta; R Dean Boyd; John F Patience
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-06

9.  Lawsonia intracellularis infected enterocytes lack sucrase-isomaltase which contributes to reduced pig digestive capacity.

Authors:  Emma T Helm; Eric R Burrough; Fernando L Leite; Nicholas K Gabler
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.683

10.  A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application.

Authors:  John F Patience; Mariana C Rossoni-Serão; Néstor A Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.