BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Most previous studies have investigated ligament mechanical properties at slow elongation rates of less than 25 mm/s. PURPOSE: To determine the tensile mechanical properties, at a fast elongation rate, of intact human cervical anterior and posterior longitudinal, capsular, and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, middle-third disc, and ligamentum flavum. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: In vitro biomechanical study. METHODS: A total of 97 intact bone-ligament-bone specimens (C2-C3 to C7-T1) were prepared from six cervical spines (average age: 80.6 years, range, 71 to 92 years) and were elongated to complete rupture at an average (SD) peak rate of 723 (106) mm/s using a custom-built apparatus. Nonlinear force versus elongation curves were plotted and peak force, peak elongation, peak energy, and stiffness were statistically compared (p<.05) among ligaments. A mathematical model was developed to determine the quasi-static physiological ligament elongation. RESULTS: Highest average peak force, up to 244.4 and 220.0 N in the ligamentum flavum and capsular ligament, respectively, were significantly greater than in the anterior longitudinal ligament and middle-third disc. Highest peak elongation reached 5.9 mm in the intraspinous and supraspinous ligaments, significantly greater than in the middle-third disc. Highest peak energy of 0.57 J was attained in the capsular ligament, significantly greater than in the anterior longitudinal ligament and middle-third disc. Average stiffness was generally greatest in the ligamentum flavum and least in the intraspinous and supraspinous ligaments. For all ligaments, peak elongation was greater than average physiological elongation computed using the mathematical model. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the present results with previously reported data indicated that high-speed elongation may cause cervical ligaments to fail at a higher peak force and smaller peak elongation and they may be stiffer and absorb less energy, as compared with a slow elongation rate. These comparisons may be useful to clinicians for diagnosing cervical ligament injuries based upon the specific trauma.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Most previous studies have investigated ligament mechanical properties at slow elongation rates of less than 25 mm/s. PURPOSE: To determine the tensile mechanical properties, at a fast elongation rate, of intact human cervical anterior and posterior longitudinal, capsular, and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, middle-third disc, and ligamentum flavum. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: In vitro biomechanical study. METHODS: A total of 97 intact bone-ligament-bone specimens (C2-C3 to C7-T1) were prepared from six cervical spines (average age: 80.6 years, range, 71 to 92 years) and were elongated to complete rupture at an average (SD) peak rate of 723 (106) mm/s using a custom-built apparatus. Nonlinear force versus elongation curves were plotted and peak force, peak elongation, peak energy, and stiffness were statistically compared (p<.05) among ligaments. A mathematical model was developed to determine the quasi-static physiological ligament elongation. RESULTS: Highest average peak force, up to 244.4 and 220.0 N in the ligamentum flavum and capsular ligament, respectively, were significantly greater than in the anterior longitudinal ligament and middle-third disc. Highest peak elongation reached 5.9 mm in the intraspinous and supraspinous ligaments, significantly greater than in the middle-third disc. Highest peak energy of 0.57 J was attained in the capsular ligament, significantly greater than in the anterior longitudinal ligament and middle-third disc. Average stiffness was generally greatest in the ligamentum flavum and least in the intraspinous and supraspinous ligaments. For all ligaments, peak elongation was greater than average physiological elongation computed using the mathematical model. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the present results with previously reported data indicated that high-speed elongation may cause cervical ligaments to fail at a higher peak force and smaller peak elongation and they may be stiffer and absorb less energy, as compared with a slow elongation rate. These comparisons may be useful to clinicians for diagnosing cervical ligament injuries based upon the specific trauma.
Authors: J B Myklebust; F Pintar; N Yoganandan; J F Cusick; D Maiman; T J Myers; A Sances Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1988-05 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Erika M K P Barros; Consuelo J Rodrigues; Nilson R Rodrigues; Reginaldo P Oliveira; Tarcisio E P Barros; Aldo J Rodrigues Journal: Spine J Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Calvin Kuo; Jodie Sheffels; Michael Fanton; Ina Bianca Yu; Rosa Hamalainen; David Camarillo Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Robert A Hartman; Robert E Tisherman; Cheng Wang; Kevin M Bell; Joon Y Lee; Gwendolyn A Sowa; James D Kang Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Michele Curatolo; Nikolai Bogduk; Paul C Ivancic; Samuel A McLean; Gunter P Siegmund; Beth A Winkelstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Yasuhiro Tominaga; Anthony B Ndu; Marcus P Coe; Arnold J Valenson; Paul C Ivancic; Shigeki Ito; Wolfgang Rubin; Manohar M Panjabi Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Gunter P Siegmund; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter; John R Brault; J Timothy Inglis Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 2.362