Literature DB >> 17996405

Application of a neonatal assessment of visual function in a population of low risk full-term newborn.

Daniela Ricci1, Domenico M M Romeo, Francesca Serrao, Laura Cesarini, Francesca Gallini, Francesco Cota, Daniela Leone, Antonio A Zuppa, Costantino Romagnoli, Frances Cowan, Eugenio Mercuri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously developed and described a battery of 9 items suitable for assessing different clinical aspects of visual function in newborn infants. AIM OF THE STUDY: Application of the test battery to a cohort of low risk term-born infants at 48 and 72 h after birth 1) to define the normative distribution of results for each item and 2) to document any effect of postnatal age. STUDY DESIGN AND
SUBJECTS: 124 term-born low risk infants were assessed at 48 h; fifty of them were re-assessed 24 h later at 72 h.
RESULTS: The visual test battery was successfully completed in 110 of the 124 infants assessed at 48 h and in all the 50 infants assessed at 72 h after birth. For 3 of the 9 items (fixation on a black/white target of concentric circles, on a coloured (red/yellow) face and horizontal tracking), the findings were very similar at both ages. For the remaining 6 items the range of findings was wider. There was a statistical difference in the responses obtained at 48 and 72 h for vertical and arc tracking (p<0.05) and the ability to discriminate stripes and attention at distance (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results provide information on the visual abilities in a low risk population of term-born infants and the distribution of frequency of their visual responses to our battery of visual tests. These findings may be used as reference data when using our visual test battery in both clinical and research settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17996405     DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  4 in total

Review 1.  The human newborn's umwelt: Unexplored pathways and perspectives.

Authors:  Vanessa André; Séverine Henry; Alban Lemasson; Martine Hausberger; Virginie Durier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

2.  Evaluation and Acceptability of a Simplified Test of Visual Function at Birth in a Limited-Resource Setting.

Authors:  Verena I Carrara; Mue Chae Darakomon; Nant War War Thin; Naw Ta Kaw Paw; Naw Wah; Hser Gay Wah; Naw Helen; Suporn Keereecharoen; Naw Ta Mlar Paw; Podjanee Jittamala; François H Nosten; Daniela Ricci; Rose McGready
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Short- and mid-term multidisciplinary outcomes of newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in utero or during the perinatal period: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Danilo Buonsenso; Simonetta Costa; Lucia Giordano; Francessca Priolo; Arianna Turriziani Colonna; Sofia Morini; Martina Sbarbati; Davide Pata; Anna Acampora; Guido Conti; Fabrizio Crudo; Alessandro Cantiani; Bianca Maria Martina; Giulia Maria Amorelli; Lorenzo Orazi; Maria Petrianni; Daniela Ricci; Antonio Lanzone; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Paola Cattani; Michela Sali; Domenico Romeo; Giuseppe Zampino; Giovanni Vento; Piero Valentini
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.860

4.  PREMM: preterm early massage by the mother: protocol of a randomised controlled trial of massage therapy in very preterm infants.

Authors:  Melissa M Lai; Giulia D'Acunto; Andrea Guzzetta; Roslyn N Boyd; Stephen E Rose; Jurgen Fripp; Simon Finnigan; Naoni Ngenda; Penny Love; Koa Whittingham; Kerstin Pannek; Robert S Ware; Paul B Colditz
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.