| Literature DB >> 17996118 |
Shoufeng Wang1, Yong Qiu, Zezhang Zhu, Zhaolong Ma, Caiwei Xia, Feng Zhu.
Abstract
Asymmetrical growth of the vertebrae has been implicated as one possible etiologic factor in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The longitudinal vertebral growth derives from the endochondral ossification of the vertebral growth plate. In the present study, the growth plates from the convex and concave side of the vertebrae were characterized by the method of histology and immunohistochemistry to evaluate the growth activity, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Normal zoned architectures were observed in the convex side of the growth plate and disorganized architectures in the concave side. The histological grades were significantly different between the convex and the concave side of the growth plate in the apex vertebrae (P < 0.05). The histological difference was also found significant statistically between end vertebrae and apex vertebrae in the concave side of vertebral growth plates (P < 0.05). The proliferative potential indexes and apoptosis indexes of chondrocytes in the proliferative and hypertrophic zone in the convex side were significantly higher than that in the concave side in the apex vertebral growth plate (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference of the proliferative potential index (proliferating cell nuclear antigen, PCNA index) between convex side and concave side at the upper end vertebra (P < 0.05). The difference of the proliferative potential index and apoptosis index were found significant statistically in the concave side of the vertebral growth plate between end vertebrae and apex vertebrae (P < 0.05). The same result was also found for the apoptosis index (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate biotin nick end labeling assay, TUNEL index) in the convex side of vertebral growth plate between end vertebrae and apex vertebrae (P < 0.05). Some correlation were found between radiographic measurements and proliferation and apoptosis indexes. The difference in histological grades and cellular activity between the convex and concave side indicated that the bilateral growth plate of the vertebrae in AIS patients have different growth kinetics which may affect the curve progression.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17996118 PMCID: PMC2186319 DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1The histological grades of growth plates in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Grade 0 showing no signs of proliferative cartilage zone and growth activity(A). Grade I showing some proliferative cartilage zone but no growth activity(B). Grade II showing areas of growth inactivity and areas of proliferative cartilage zones(C). Grade III showing proliferative cartilage zones throughout the section(D).
The difference of histological grades between the convex side and concave side of the vertebral growth plate
| Upper end | Apex | Lower end | ||||
| Locations HGs | 0-I | II-III | 0-I | II-III | 0-I | II-III |
| Convex side | 5 | 16 | 2 | 19* | 4 | 17 |
| Concave side | 8 | 13# | 19 | 2*#+ | 8 | 13+ |
Note: * indicates statistical significant between convex side and concave side(P < 0.05);# indicates statistical significant between upper end vertebrae and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05); +indicates statistical significant between lower end vertebra and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05)
The proliferation potential indexes(PCNA indexes)(Mean ± SD) between the convex side and the concave side of the vertebral growth plate (%)
| Locations | Upper end | Apex | Lower end | |
| Resting zone | Convex side | 2.78 ± 0.71 | 2.80 ± 0.71 | 2.69 ± 0.51 |
| Concave side | 2.65 ± 0.56 | 2.77 ± 0.56 | 2.43 ± 0.76 | |
| Proliferative & Hypertrophic zone | Convex side | 42.90 ± 11.46* | 43.43 ± 5.47* | 42.81 ± 3.10 |
| Concave side | 39.17 ± 5.13*# | 25.63 ± 7.22*#+ | 41.89 ± 3.27+ |
Note: * indicates statistical significant between convex side and concave side(P < 0.05);# indicates statistical significant between upper end vertebrae and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05); +indicates statistical significant between lower end vertebra and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05)
Figure 2Microphotographs of PCNA-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the resting zone and in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of growth plate of apex vertebrae in AIS patient under micro camera(Magnification: 400×). PCNA-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the resting zone of convex side(A). PCNA-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the resting zone of concave side(B). PCNA-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of convex side(C). PCNA-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of concave side(D).
The apoptosis indexes(TUNEL indexes) (Mean ± SD) between the convex side and the concave side of the vertebral growth plate (%)
| Locations | Upper end | Apex | Lower end | |
| Resting zone | Convex side | 3.67 ± 0.89 | 3.89 ± 0.9 | 2.47 ± 0.39 |
| Concave side | 3.46 ± 0.45 | 3.76 ± 0.4 | 2.56 ± 0.68 | |
| Proliferative & Hypertrophic zone | Convex side | 36.09 ± 6.72# | 41.23 ± 5.55*#+ | 36.67 ± 6.31+ |
| Concave side | 33.82 ± 4.71# | 26.13 ± 5.89*#+ | 35.70 ± 4.32+ |
Note: * indicates statistical significant between convex side and concave side(P < 0.05);# indicates statistical significant between upper end vertebrae and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05); +indicates statistical significant between lower end vertebra and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05)
Figure 3Microphotographs of TUNEL-positive chondrocytes in the resting zone and in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of growth plate of apex vertebrae in AIS patient(Magnification: 400×). TUNEL-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the resting zone of convex side(A). TUNEL-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the resting zone of concave side(B). TUNEL-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of convex side(C). TUNEL-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of concave side(D).
The apoptosis indexes(PARP indexes) (Mean ± SD) between the convex side and the concave side of the vertebral growth plate (%)
| Locations | Upper end | Apex | Lower end | |
| Resting zone | Convex side | 2.45 ± 0.31 | 2.27 ± 0.39 | 2.67 ± 0.52 |
| Concave side | 2.56 ± 0.6 | 2.41 ± 0.67 | 2.37 ± 0.35 | |
| Proliferative & Hypertrophic zone | Convex side | 31.13 ± 6.79 | 32.70 ± 6.45* | 31.69 ± 6.36 |
| Concave side | 31.37 ± 4.26# | 24.00 ± 7.24*#+ | 32.02 ± 6.02+ |
Note: * indicates statistical significant between convex side and concave side(P < 0.05);# indicates statistical significant between upper end vertebrae and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05); +indicates statistical significant between lower end vertebra and apex vertebrae(P < 0.05)
Figure 4Microphotographs of PARP-positive chondrocytes in the resting zone and in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of growth plate of apex vertebrae in AIS patient(Magnification: 400×). PARP-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the resting zone of convex side(A). PARP-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the resting zone of concave side(B). PARP-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of convex side(C). PARP-positive chondrocytes (arrows) in the proliferative & hypertrophic zone of concave side(D).
Correlation of proliferation or apoptosis indexes to various radiographic measurements
| Measurements | Cobb | AVT | AVR | DWA | ||
| Upper end vertebral growth plate | Convex side | PCNA | 0.251 | 0.232 | 0.362 | 0.334 |
| TUNEL | 0.184 | 0.090 | 0.204 | 0.166 | ||
| PARP | 0.417 | 0.384 | 0.427 | 0.326 | ||
| Concave side | PCNA | -0.100 | -0.099 | -0.057 | 0.035 | |
| TUNEL | -0.125 | -0.202 | -0.118 | -0.005 | ||
| PARP | -0.488* | -0.549* | -0.295 | -0.464* | ||
| Apex vertebral growth plate | Convex side | PCNA | 0.453* | 0.519* | 0.498* | 0.299 |
| TUNEL | 0.395 | 0.324 | 0.493* | 0.254 | ||
| PARP | 0.563* | 0.556* | 0.641* | 0.417 | ||
| Concave side | PCNA | -0.589* | -0.547* | -0.404 | -0.538* | |
| TUNEL | -0.774* | -0.814* | -0.710* | -0.657* | ||
| PARP | -0.339 | -0.364 | -0.185 | -0.323 | ||
| Lower end vertebral growth plate | Convex side | PCNA | -0.069 | -0.024 | 0.266 | 0.106 |
| TUNEL | -0.080 | -0.048 | 0.183 | 0.002 | ||
| PARP | -0.099 | 0.018 | 0.195 | 0.029 | ||
| Concave side | PCNA | -0.106 | -0.046 | 0.166 | -0.010 | |
| TUNEL | -0.240 | -0.224 | -0.232 | -0.146 | ||
| PARP | -0.275 | -0.179 | 0.080 | -0.170 | ||
Correlation of proliferation or apoptosis indexes with various radiographic measurements expressed as Pearson or spearmen correlation coefficients with significance set at P < 0.05. * Statistical significance.
AVT = Apex vertical translation; AVR = Apex vertebral rotation; DWA = Disc wedging angle of apex.
Correlation of difference of proliferation or apoptosis indexes between convex and concave side to various radiographic measurements
| Measurements | Cobb | AVT | AVR | CWAD | ||
| Upper end vertebral growth plate | Convex-Concave | PCNA | 0.646* | 0.607* | 0.573* | 0.612* |
| TUNEL | 0.603* | 0.557* | 0.541* | 0.341 | ||
| PARP | 0.717* | 0.729* | 0.679* | 0.618* | ||
| Apex vertebral growth plate | Convex-Concave | PCNA | 0.825* | 0.845* | 0.662* | 0.662* |
| TUNEL | 0.898* | 0.900* | 0.850* | 0.722* | ||
| PARP | 0.756* | 0.776* | 0.505* | 0.632* | ||
| Lower end vertebral growth plate | Convex-Concave | PCNA | 0.055 | 0.037 | 0.153 | 0.237 |
| TUNEL | 0.228 | 0.256 | 0.516* | 0.223 | ||
| PARP | 0.229 | 0.264 | 0.581* | 0.269 | ||
Correlation of difference of proliferation or apoptosis indexes between convex and concave side with various radiographic measurements expressed as Pearson or Spearmen correlation coefficients with significance set at P < 0.05. * Statistical significance.
AVT = Apex vertical translation; AVR = Apex vertebral rotation; DWA = Disc wedging angle of apex.