BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is strongly influenced by heritability. Identifying heritable vulnerability traits (endophenotypes) that mark a relatively high risk of developing the disorder can contribute to the identification of risk genes. A fruitful area for the search for such endophenotypes may be motor control in children with ADHD, since the disorder is frequently accompanied by motor problems. METHOD: The current study used a large sample of 350 children with ADHD, 195 non-affected siblings and 271 normal controls aged 5-19 years. Children were administered two computerised motor control tasks in which they had to trace a path between two circles (Tracking task) and follow a randomly moving target (Pursuit task). Both tasks were performed with both the right and the left hand. RESULTS: Children with ADHD were less precise and stable than controls. Non-affected siblings also deviated from controls, but only on the Tracking task. Group differences were modulated by the use of the right versus the left hand: no group differences emerged when the right hand was used, yet group differences did emerge when the left hand was used. Performance on both tasks was significantly familial. CONCLUSIONS: Imprecision and instability of movements in children with ADHD and in their non-affected siblings as measured by the Tracking task might be suitable endophenotypic candidates: these deficits are familially present in children having ADHD as well as in their non-affected siblings. Motor performance might be best assessed in children using their left hand, because motor control deficits are most pronounced using the left hand. This might relate to right hemispheric brain pathology in children with ADHD (and possibly in their non-affected siblings) that is related to the control of the left hand and/or relate to differential effects of daily life practice on both hands, which may be smaller on the left hand.
BACKGROUND:Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is strongly influenced by heritability. Identifying heritable vulnerability traits (endophenotypes) that mark a relatively high risk of developing the disorder can contribute to the identification of risk genes. A fruitful area for the search for such endophenotypes may be motor control in children with ADHD, since the disorder is frequently accompanied by motor problems. METHOD: The current study used a large sample of 350 children with ADHD, 195 non-affected siblings and 271 normal controls aged 5-19 years. Children were administered two computerised motor control tasks in which they had to trace a path between two circles (Tracking task) and follow a randomly moving target (Pursuit task). Both tasks were performed with both the right and the left hand. RESULTS:Children with ADHD were less precise and stable than controls. Non-affected siblings also deviated from controls, but only on the Tracking task. Group differences were modulated by the use of the right versus the left hand: no group differences emerged when the right hand was used, yet group differences did emerge when the left hand was used. Performance on both tasks was significantly familial. CONCLUSIONS: Imprecision and instability of movements in children with ADHD and in their non-affected siblings as measured by the Tracking task might be suitable endophenotypic candidates: these deficits are familially present in children having ADHD as well as in their non-affected siblings. Motor performance might be best assessed in children using their left hand, because motor control deficits are most pronounced using the left hand. This might relate to right hemispheric brain pathology in children with ADHD (and possibly in their non-affected siblings) that is related to the control of the left hand and/or relate to differential effects of daily life practice on both hands, which may be smaller on the left hand.
Authors: Nanda N J Rommelse; Alejandro Arias-Vásquez; Marieke E Altink; Cathelijne J M Buschgens; Ellen Fliers; Philip Asherson; Stephen V Faraone; Jan K Buitelaar; Joseph A Sergeant; Jaap Oosterlaan; Barbara Franke Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Amy R Altszuler; Anne S Morrow; Brittany M Merrill; Shannon Bressler; Fiona L Macphee; Elizabeth M Gnagy; Andrew R Greiner; Stefany Coxe; Joseph S Raiker; Erika Coles; William E Pelham Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2017-01-19
Authors: Henrik Uebel; Björn Albrecht; Philip Asherson; Norbert A Börger; Louise Butler; Wai Chen; Hanna Christiansen; Alexander Heise; Jonna Kuntsi; Ulrike Schäfer; Penny Andreou; Iris Manor; Rafaela Marco; Ana Miranda; Aisling Mulligan; Robert D Oades; Jaap van der Meere; Stephen V Faraone; Aribert Rothenberger; Tobias Banaschewski Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Nanda N J Rommelse; Marieke E Altink; Ellen A Fliers; Neilson C Martin; Cathelijne J M Buschgens; Catharina A Hartman; Jan K Buitelaar; Stephen V Faraone; Joseph A Sergeant; Jaap Oosterlaan Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2009-08
Authors: Nicholas Cothros; Alex Medina; Davide Martino; Sean P Dukelow; Rachel L Hawe; Adam Kirton; Christos Ganos; Elaheh Nosratmirshekarlou; Tamara Pringsheim Journal: Neural Plast Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Nanda Nj Rommelse; Marieke E Altink; Neilson C Martin; Cathelijne Jm Buschgens; Stephen V Faraone; Jan K Buitelaar; Joseph A Sergeant; Jaap Oosterlaan Journal: Behav Brain Funct Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 3.759
Authors: Nanda N J Rommelse; Marieke E Altink; Jaap Oosterlaan; Leo Beem; Cathelijne J M Buschgens; Jan Buitelaar; Joseph A Sergeant Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2007-12-11 Impact factor: 2.805