Literature DB >> 17994516

Comparison of hospitalwide surveillance and targeted intensive care unit surveillance of healthcare-associated infections.

David J Weber1, Emily E Sickbert-Bennett, Vickie Brown, William A Rutala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the surveillance coverage obtained with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), which is focused on intensive care units (ICUs) and emphasizes device-related infections (ie, those associated with central venous catheters, ventilators, and/or urinary catheters), compared with the surveillance coverage achieved by comprehensive hospitalwide surveillance. In addition, we assessed whether the infection rates in step-down units more resemble those in wards or ICUs.
METHODS: Review of prospectively obtained, comprehensive hospitalwide surveillance data from 2004 through 2005 for an acute care tertiary care hospital with approximately 700 beds. Surveillance data was obtained by trained infection control professionals using standard CDC criteria for HAIs.
RESULTS: CDC-recommended ICU surveillance for catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia would have detected only 87 (21.4%) of 407 catheter-related BSIs and only 66 (37.9%) of 174 respiratory tract infections that occurred in the medical and surgical services. Only 31 (34.8%) of 89 infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 7 (31.8%) of 22 infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus occurred in our adult ICUs.
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of HAIs were highest in the ICUs, intermediate in step-down units, and lowest in the wards. The rates of infections in the step-down units were more similar to those in the wards than to those in the ICUs. To prevent HAIs, more comprehensive surveillance may be indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17994516     DOI: 10.1086/523868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  6 in total

1.  Quality indicators for ICU: ISCCM guidelines for ICUs in India.

Authors:  B Ray; D P Samaddar; S K Todi; N Ramakrishnan; George John; Suresh Ramasubban
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-10

2.  Central line-associated bloodstream infection surveillance outside the intensive care unit: a multicenter survey.

Authors:  Crystal H Son; Titus L Daniels; Janet A Eagan; Michael B Edmond; Neil O Fishman; Thomas G Fraser; Mini Kamboj; Lisa L Maragakis; Sapna A Mehta; Trish M Perl; Michael S Phillips; Connie S Price; Thomas R Talbot; Stephen J Wilson; Kent A Sepkowitz
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Consistency between guidelines and reported practice for reducing the risk of catheter-related infection in British paediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Katie Harron; Geethanjali Ramachandra; Quen Mok; Ruth Gilbert
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Estimation of the incidence of MRSA patients: evaluation of a surveillance system using health insurance claim data.

Authors:  S Tanihara; S Suzuki
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Beyond the bundle--journey of a tertiary care medical intensive care unit to zero central line-associated bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Matthew C Exline; Naeem A Ali; Nancy Zikri; Julie E Mangino; Kelly Torrence; Brenda Vermillion; Jamie St Clair; Mark E Lustberg; Preeti Pancholi; Madhuri M Sopirala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  A scoping review of registry captured indicators for evaluating quality of critical care in ICU.

Authors:  Issrah Jawad; Sumayyah Rashan; Chathurani Sigera; Jorge Salluh; Arjen M Dondorp; Rashan Haniffa; Abi Beane
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-08-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.