Literature DB >> 17994281

Characterization of fine aerosol and its inorganic components at two rural locations in New York State.

Ramya Sunder Raman1, Philip K Hopke, Thomas M Holsen.   

Abstract

Samples of PM(2.5) were collected to measure the concentrations of its chemical constituents at two rural locations, Potsdam and Stockton, NY from November 2002 to August 2005. These samples were collected on multiple filters at both sites, every third day for a 24-h interval with a speciation network sampler. The Teflo filters were analyzed for PM(2.5) mass by gravimetry, and elemental composition by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Nylasorb filters and Teflo filters were leached with water and analyzed for anions and cations, respectively, by ion chromatography (IC). Fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) mass and its inorganic component measurements were statistically characterized, and the temporal behavior of these species were assessed. Over the entire study period, PM(2.5) mass concentrations were lower at Potsdam (8.35 microg/m(3)) than at Stockton (10.24 microg/m(3)). At both locations, organic matter (OM) was the highest contributor to mass. Sulfate was the second highest contributor to mass at 27.0% at Potsdam, and 28.7% at Stockton. Nitrate contributions to mass of 8.9 and 9.5% at Potsdam and Stockton, respectively, were the third highest. At both locations, fine PM mass exhibited an annual cycle with a pronounced summer peak and indications of another peak during the winter, consistent with an overall increase in the rate of secondary aerosol formation during the summer, and increased partitioning of ammonium nitrate to the particle phase and condensation of other semi-volatiles during the winter, respectively. An ion-balance analysis indicated that at both locations, during the summers as well as in the winters, the aerosol was acidic. Lognormal frequency distribution fits to the measured mass concentrations on a seasonal basis indicated the overall increase in particle phase secondary aerosol (sulfate and SOA) concentrations during the summers compared to the winters at both locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17994281     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9998-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  A physical explanation of the lognormality of pollutant concentrations.

Authors:  W R Ott
Journal:  J Air Waste Manage Assoc       Date:  1990-10

2.  Statistical characterization of atmospheric PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at a non-impacted suburban site of Istanbul, Turkey.

Authors:  Ferhat Karaca; Omar Alagha; Ferruh Ertürk
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Frequency Distributions of PM10 Chemical Components and Their Sources.

Authors:  A S Kao; S K Friedlander
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Measured summertime concentrations of particulate components, Hg0, and speciated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at rural sites in New York State.

Authors:  Philip K Hopke; Wei Liu; Young-ji Han; Seung-Muk Yi; Thomas M Holsen; Scott Cybart; Michael Milligan
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Epidemiological study of PM2.5 and risk of COPD-related hospital visits in association with particle constituents in Chuncheon, Korea.

Authors:  Yong Suk Jo; Myoung Nam Lim; Young-Ji Han; Woo Jin Kim
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-01-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.