Literature DB >> 17993940

Acute renal failure in critically ill surgical patients: persistent lethality despite new modes of renal replacement therapy.

Soumitra R Eachempati1, John C L Wang, Lynn J Hydo, Jian Shou, Philip S Barie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite improved resuscitation and sepsis care, acute renal failure (ARF) remains common in critically ill surgical patients. New methods of renal replacement therapy (RRT) are being used in surgical intensive care units (SICUs), including high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and continuous RRT (CRRT). RRT is being used increasingly early in the course of ARF, but data are scant to suggest that mortality is improved. Consequently, we determined whether outcomes were improved with CRRT in SICU patients, and hypothesized that CRRT lowers mortality for patients with ARF.
METHODS: Patients who developed ARF (acute increase in serum creatinine concentration >or=2.4 mg/dL) in the SICU from 1993 to 2004 were identified. Data collected prospectively included year of admission, age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score, cumulative multiple organ dysfunction score and its individual components, cumulative nonrenal organ dysfunction score, and need for RRT. Patients were stratified January 1994 to January 2001 (pre-CRRT) and February 2001 to December 2004 (post-CRRT). The primary endpoint was mortality.
RESULTS: Among 8,505 SICU patients, 530 (6.2%) developed ARF. Three hundred and eleven patients were treated pre-CRRT and 219 thereafter. Female patients comprised 35% of ARF patients. The mean age was 69 years +/- 2 years, and the mean APACHE III score was 81 +/- 1 point for ARF patients. HD was performed in 15.6% of ARF patients before 2001 and 5.5% of ARF patients in 2001 and thereafter. CRRT was performed in 20.1% of ARF patients in 2001 and thereafter. Overall mortality for ARF patients was 45% (APACHE III normative predicted mortality: 55%) with no difference over time (pre-CRRT = 46.3%, post-CRRT = 45.2%, p = 0.86). Patients who required RRT had a mean APACHE III score of 91 +/- 1 point, with 61% mortality (predicted mortality: 67%), with no difference over time. Independent predictors of mortality overall and for ARF patients included age and the magnitude of renal, cardiovascular, hepatic, and neurologic dysfunction. In comparison with CRRT, HD was associated with a decreased risk of death.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite more frequent RRT and the use of CRRT, the mortality of ARF in critically ill surgical patients remains high because of nonrenal organ dysfunction. Considering that ARF-related mortality was decreased by intermittent HD, and that intermittent RRT is less costly, patients who need RRT should be treated preferentially with HD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17993940     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181574930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  10 in total

1.  Late initiation of renal replacement therapy is associated with worse outcomes in acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Chih-Chung Shiao; Vin-Cent Wu; Wen-Yi Li; Yu-Feng Lin; Fu-Chang Hu; Guang-Huar Young; Chin-Chi Kuo; Tze-Wah Kao; Down-Ming Huang; Yung-Ming Chen; Pi-Ru Tsai; Shuei-Liong Lin; Nai-Kuan Chou; Tzu-Hsin Lin; Yu-Chang Yeh; Chih-Hsien Wang; Anne Chou; Wen-Je Ko; Kwan-Dun Wu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  The effect of timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Milo Engoren; Michael D Maile; Michael Heung; James M Blum; Ross Blank; Lena M Napolitano; Pauline K Park; Krishnan Raghavendran; Elizabeth S Jewell; Craig Meldrum
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2019-12-05

3.  U-curve association between timing of renal replacement therapy initiation and in-hospital mortality in postoperative acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Chih-Chung Shiao; Wen-Je Ko; Vin-Cent Wu; Tao-Min Huang; Chun-Fu Lai; Yu-Feng Lin; Chia-Ter Chao; Tzong-Shinn Chu; Hung-Bin Tsai; Pei-Chen Wu; Guang-Huar Young; Tze-Wah Kao; Jenq-Wen Huang; Yung-Ming Chen; Shuei-Liong Lin; Ming-Shou Wu; Pi-Ru Tsai; Kwan-Dun Wu; Ming-Jiuh Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Post-traumatic acute kidney injury: a cross-sectional study of trauma patients.

Authors:  Wei-Hung Lai; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Yi-Chun Chen; Pao-Jen Kuo; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Ching-Hua Hsieh; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Biomarkers of renal recovery after acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sérgio Mina Gaião; José Artur Osório de Carvalho Paiva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  Impact of thyroid function on cystatin C in detecting acute kidney injury: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Danqing Zhang; Lu Gao; Heng Ye; Ruibin Chi; Lin Wang; Linhui Hu; Xin Ouyang; Yating Hou; Yujun Deng; Yi Long; Weiping Xiong; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Acetylbritannilactone attenuates contrast-induced acute kidney injury through its anti-pyroptosis effects.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Jingchao Lu; Xiuchun Yang; Bing Xiao; Huiqiang Chen; Weina Pei; Yaqiong Jin; Mengxiao Wang; Yue Li; Jie Zhang; Fan Liu; Guoqiang Gu; Wei Cui
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Characteristics and outcomes of trauma patients with ICU lengths of stay 30 days and greater: a seven-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Adrian W Ong; Laurel A Omert; Diane Vido; Brian M Goodman; Jack Protetch; Aurelio Rodriguez; Elan Jeremitsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Technological advancements in the care of the trauma patient.

Authors:  J J Siracuse; N N Saillant; C J Hauser
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 10.  Incidence and associations of acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  M E O'Connor; C J Kirwan; R M Pearse; J R Prowle
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 17.440

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.