Literature DB >> 17993309

Detection of cardiac tachyarrhythmias in implantable devices.

Jeffrey Gillberg1.   

Abstract

Implantable devices such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) use algorithms to sense cardiac depolarizations and to detect tachyarrhythmias by analysis of timing and morphology of sensed events. The purpose of tachyarrhythmia detection in these devices is to guide electrical therapies delivered by the pacemaker or ICD and/or to provide clinical diagnostics for medical management of patients. Unlike electrocardiographic analysis methods that rely on postanalysis of recorded signals using desktop computers, implantable devices must make detection decisions on a beat-by-beat basis with algorithms that can be implemented in battery-powered devices with longevities of up to several years. Cardiac sensing in implantable devices is achieved using amplifiers, bandpass filters, and adaptive thresholds to avoid oversensing of cardiac and noncardiac activity, while avoiding undersensing of low-amplitude cardiac activations during fibrillation. The tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms are formed by combining different building blocks of rhythm information extracted from timing of cardiac activations and from electrogram morphology information. Tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms in ICDs were originally designed to achieve high sensitivity for detection of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Much of the progress in ICD detection algorithms in the past 15 years has been in the development of supraventricular tachycardia discrimination algorithms to reduce the number of inappropriate therapies delivered by ICDs. This article provides an overview of current tachyarrhythmia detection approaches, describe challenges facing tachyarrhythmia detection algorithm performance in ICD patients with primary prevention indications, and presents future directions in cardiac tachyarrhythmia detection for implantable devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17993309     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  4 in total

1.  [Single- and dual-chamber ICDs: Are there still significant differences compared to pacemakers with regard to implantation and follow-up?].

Authors:  M Stockburger
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

2.  Reduction of the inappropriate ICD therapies by implementing a new fuzzy logic-based diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Michał Lewandowski; Andrzej Przybylski; Wiesław Kuźmicz; Hanna Szwed
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Broad complex tachycardia in a patient with a pacemaker: What is the mechanism?

Authors:  Ben Ng; Robert W Giles; Zal Dastur; Mark A McGuire
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-20

4.  Adding wisdom to 'smart' bioelectronic systems: a design framework for physiologic control including practical examples.

Authors:  Aysegul Gunduz; Enrico Opri; Ro'ee Gilron; Vaclav Kremen; Gregory Worrell; Phil Starr; Kent Leyde; Timothy Denison
Journal:  Bioelectron Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.