Literature DB >> 17992183

Glycemic index and glycemic load: measurement issues and their effect on diet-disease relationships.

B J Venn1, T J Green.   

Abstract

Glycemic index (GI) describes the blood glucose response after consumption of a carbohydrate containing test food relative to a carbohydrate containing reference food, typically glucose or white bread. GI was originally designed for people with diabetes as a guide to food selection, advice being given to select foods with a low GI. The amount of food consumed is a major determinant of postprandial hyperglycemia, and the concept of glycemic load (GL) takes account of the GI of a food and the amount eaten. More recent recommendations regarding the potential of low GI and GL diets to reduce the risk of chronic diseases and to treat conditions other than diabetes, should be interpreted in the light of the individual variation in blood glucose levels and other methodological issues relating to measurement of GI and GL. Several factors explain the large inter- and intra-individual variation in glycemic response to foods. More reliable measurements of GI and GL of individual foods than are currently available can be obtained by studying, under standard conditions, a larger number of subjects than has typically been the case in the past. Meta-analyses suggest that foods with a low GI or GL may confer benefit in terms of glycemic control in diabetes and lipid management. However, low GI and GL foods can be energy dense and contain substantial amounts of sugars or undesirable fats that contribute to a diminished glycemic response. Therefore, functionality in terms of a low glycemic response alone does not necessarily justify a health claim. Most studies, which have demonstrated health benefits of low GI or GL involved naturally occurring and minimally processed carbohydrate containing cereals, vegetables and fruit. These foods have qualities other than their immediate impact on postprandial glycemia as a basis to recommend their consumption. When the GI or GL concepts are used to guide food choice, this should be done in the context of other nutritional indicators and when values have been reliably measured in a large group of individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17992183     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  73 in total

Review 1.  Glycemic index, glycemic load and endometrial cancer risk: results from the Australian National Endometrial Cancer study and an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christina M Nagle; Catherine M Olsen; Torukiri I Ibiebele; Amanda B Spurdle; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Low-glycemic index diet may improve insulin sensitivity in obese children.

Authors:  Chonnikant Visuthranukul; Pathama Sirimongkol; Aree Prachansuwan; Chandhita Pruksananonda; Sirinuch Chomtho
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Organoleptic and glycemic properties of chickpea-wheat composite breads.

Authors:  Tasleem A Zafar; Fatima Al-Hassawi; Fatima Al-Khulaifi; Ghanima Al-Rayyes; Carol Waslien; Fatma G Huffman
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Acculturation and sociocultural influences on dietary intake and health status among Puerto Rican adults in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Maria I van Rompay; Nicola M McKeown; Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa; Luis M Falcón; José M Ordovás; Katherine L Tucker
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Estimating the reliability of glycemic index values and potential sources of methodological and biological variability.

Authors:  Nirupa R Matthan; Lynne M Ausman; Huicui Meng; Hocine Tighiouart; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Short-term impact of sugar consumption on hunger and ad libitum food intake in young women.

Authors:  Fernanda Ro Penaforte; Camila C Japur; Letícia P Pigatto; Paula G Chiarello; Rosa W Diez-Garcia
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 1.926

7.  Dietary fiber, magnesium, and glycemic load alter risk of type 2 diabetes in a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii.

Authors:  Beth N Hopping; Eva Erber; Andrew Grandinetti; Martijn Verheus; Laurence N Kolonel; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Glucose shortens the life span of C. elegans by downregulating DAF-16/FOXO activity and aquaporin gene expression.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Lee; Coleen T Murphy; Cynthia Kenyon
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  Dietary Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Are Positively Associated with Oxidative Stress among Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Chelsea Anderson; Ginger L Milne; Yong-Moon Mark Park; Dale P Sandler; Hazel B Nichols
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Consumption of the slow-digesting waxy maize starch leads to blunted plasma glucose and insulin response but does not influence energy expenditure or appetite in humans.

Authors:  Amanda L Sands; Heather J Leidy; Bruce R Hamaker; Paul Maguire; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.