BACKGROUND: While patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may be particularly susceptible to ventilator-induced lung injury, ventilator strategies have not been studied in this group of patients. PURPOSES: To describe the clinical course and outcome of patients with ILD and acute respiratory failure in relation to ventilatory parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of ventilated patients with ILD who had been admitted to five ICUs at a single institution. We analyzed demographic data, pulmonary function test results, severity of illness, and the parameters of continuous ventilation for the initial 24 h after admission to the ICU. Primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and 1-year survival. MAIN RESULTS: Of 94 patients with ILD, 44 (47%) survived to hospital discharge and 39 (41%) were alive at 1 year. Nonsurvivors were less likely to be postoperative, had higher severity of illness, and were ventilated at higher airway pressures and lower tidal volumes. Step changes in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of > 10 cm H(2)O were attempted in 20 patients and resulted in an increase in plateau pressure (median difference, + 16 cm H(2)O; interquartile range [IQR], 9 to 24 cm H(2)O) and a decrease in respiratory system compliance (median difference, - 0.28 mL/kg/cm H(2)O; IQR, - 0.43 to - 0.13 mL/kg/cm H(2)O). The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that high PEEP (hazard ratio, 4.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.06 to 11.15), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III score predicted mortality (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.50), age (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1 to 1.05), and low Pao(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.99) to be independent determinants of survival. CONCLUSION: Both severity of illness and high PEEP settings are associated with the decreased survival of patients with ILD who are receiving mechanical ventilation.
BACKGROUND: While patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may be particularly susceptible to ventilator-induced lung injury, ventilator strategies have not been studied in this group of patients. PURPOSES: To describe the clinical course and outcome of patients with ILD and acute respiratory failure in relation to ventilatory parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of ventilated patients with ILD who had been admitted to five ICUs at a single institution. We analyzed demographic data, pulmonary function test results, severity of illness, and the parameters of continuous ventilation for the initial 24 h after admission to the ICU. Primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and 1-year survival. MAIN RESULTS: Of 94 patients with ILD, 44 (47%) survived to hospital discharge and 39 (41%) were alive at 1 year. Nonsurvivors were less likely to be postoperative, had higher severity of illness, and were ventilated at higher airway pressures and lower tidal volumes. Step changes in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of > 10 cm H(2)O were attempted in 20 patients and resulted in an increase in plateau pressure (median difference, + 16 cm H(2)O; interquartile range [IQR], 9 to 24 cm H(2)O) and a decrease in respiratory system compliance (median difference, - 0.28 mL/kg/cm H(2)O; IQR, - 0.43 to - 0.13 mL/kg/cm H(2)O). The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that high PEEP (hazard ratio, 4.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.06 to 11.15), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III score predicted mortality (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.50), age (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1 to 1.05), and low Pao(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.99) to be independent determinants of survival. CONCLUSION: Both severity of illness and high PEEP settings are associated with the decreased survival of patients with ILD who are receiving mechanical ventilation.
Authors: Emmanuel Martinod; Jacques F Azorin; Danielle Sadoun; Marie-Dominique Destable; Philippe Le Toumelin; Elisabeth Longchampt; Marianne Kambouchner; Loïc Guillevin; Dominique Valeyre Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Roy G Brower; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur Wheeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-05-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ghulam Saydain; Ashiq Islam; Bekele Afessa; Jay H Ryu; John P Scott; Steve G Peters Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ognjen Gajic; Ousama Dabbagh; Pauline K Park; Adebola Adesanya; Steven Y Chang; Peter Hou; Harry Anderson; J Jason Hoth; Mark E Mikkelsen; Nina T Gentile; Michelle N Gong; Daniel Talmor; Ednan Bajwa; Timothy R Watkins; Emir Festic; Murat Yilmaz; Remzi Iscimen; David A Kaufman; Annette M Esper; Ruxana Sadikot; Ivor Douglas; Jonathan Sevransky; Michael Malinchoc Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kathleen O Lindell; Zhan Liang; Leslie A Hoffman; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Melissa I Saul; Joseph M Pilewski; Kevin F Gibson; Naftali Kaminski Journal: Chest Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Christopher N Schmickl; Khurram Shahjehan; Guangxi Li; Rajanigandha Dhokarh; Rahul Kashyap; Christopher Janish; Anas Alsara; Allan S Jaffe; Rolf D Hubmayr; Ognjen Gajic Journal: Chest Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Michael Kadoch; Aleksandar Kitich; Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi; Elyse Lafond; Elena Foster; Maya Juarez; Cesar Mendez; Thomas W Smith; Garrett Wong; Walter D Boyd; Jeffrey Southard; Justin M Oldham Journal: Respir Med Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 3.415