Literature DB >> 17989131

The economic impact of clean indoor air laws.

Michael Eriksen1, Frank Chaloupka.   

Abstract

Clean indoor air laws are easily implemented, are well accepted by the public, reduce nonsmoker exposure to secondhand smoke, and contribute to a reduction in overall cigarette consumption. There are currently thousands of clean indoor air laws throughout the Unites States, and the majority of Americans live in areas where smoking is completely prohibited in workplaces, restaurants, or bars. The vast majority of scientific evidence indicates that there is no negative economic impact of clean indoor air policies, with many studies finding that there may be some positive effects on local businesses. This is despite the fact that tobacco industry-sponsored research has attempted to create fears to the contrary. Further progress in the diffusion of clean indoor air laws will depend on the continued documentation of the economic impact of clean indoor air laws, particularly within the hospitality industry. This article reviews the spread of clean indoor air laws, the effect on public health, and the scientific evidence of the economic impact of implementation of clean indoor air laws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17989131     DOI: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  28 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom.

Authors:  Abraham Brown; Crawford Moodie; Gerard Hastings
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Voluntary smoking bans at home and in the car and smoking cessation, obesity, and self-control.

Authors:  Judith S Brook; Chenshu Zhang; David W Brook; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2014-02

3.  Unexpected benefits: pathways from smoking restrictions in the home to psychological well-being and distress among urban Black and Puerto Rican Americans.

Authors:  Kerstin Pahl; Judith S Brook; Jonathan Koppel; Jung Yeon Lee
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Opinions about electronic cigarette use in smoke-free areas among U.S. Adults, 2012.

Authors:  Ban A Majeed; Shanta R Dube; Kymberle Sterling; Carrie Whitney; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Knowledge and attitude toward smoke-free legislation and second-hand smoking exposure among workers in indoor bars, beer parlors and discotheques in Osun State of Nigeria.

Authors:  Olanrewaju Olusola Onigbogi; Oluwakemi Odukoya; Modupe Onigbogi; Oluwakemi Sekoni
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-03-03

6.  Effect of smoke-free legislation on Ticino gastronomy revenue.

Authors:  Peter J Schulz; Uwe Hartung; Maddalena Fiordelli
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Effects of state cigarette excise taxes and smoke-free air policies on state per capita alcohol consumption in the United States, 1980 to 2009.

Authors:  Melissa J Krauss; Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg; Andrew D Plunk; Laura J Bierut; Richard A Grucza
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Political factors affecting the enactment of state-level clean indoor air laws.

Authors:  Gregory Jackson Tung; Jon S Vernick; Elizabeth A Stuart; Daniel W Webster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The heterogeneity of the cigarette price effect on body mass index.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Charles J Courtemanche
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Stealing a march in the 21st century: accelerating progress in the 100-year war against tobacco addiction in the United States.

Authors:  Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.