Literature DB >> 17988463

Urine pH: the effects of time and temperature after collection.

Janine D Cook1, Kathy A Strauss, Yale H Caplan, Charles P Lodico, Donna M Bush.   

Abstract

The Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs provide criteria for specimen validity testing, including urine pH cut-offs, to report a urine specimen as adulterated or invalid. Since the urine pH criteria for invalid classifications, > or = 3 and < 4.5 or > or = 9 and < 11, became effective in November 2004, a number of specimens with results within the upper invalid limits, typically in the range of 9.1 to 9.3, have been reported with no evidence of adulteration. This study evaluated the hypothesis that these pH findings were the result of exposure to increased environmental temperatures during specimen standing and transport. Indeed, increased storage temperatures were associated with increased urine pH, with the magnitude of the change related to both storage time and temperature. The pH values of specimens stored at -20 degrees C are relatively stable, whereas pH results > 9 are achieved at storage temperatures of room temperature or higher. It is noteworthy that no condition(s) produced a specimen with a pH > 9.5. Degradation of nitrogenous urine analytes is most likely responsible for the noted increases in pH. These findings are intended to supplement information used by the Medical Review Officers who are responsible for interpreting such marginally invalid pH results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17988463     DOI: 10.1093/jat/31.8.486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  10 in total

1.  Is it necessary to collect and store 24-h urine samples at 4 °C?

Authors:  Azusa Iwata; Tomonari Okada; Toshiyuki Nakao
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Does the exposure of urine samples to air affect diagnostic tests for urine acidification?

Authors:  Joo-Hark Yi; Hyun-Jong Shin; Sun-Moon Kim; Sang-Woong Han; Ho-Jung Kim; Man-Seok Oh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Mechanistic PBPK Modeling of Urine pH Effect on Renal and Systemic Disposition of Methamphetamine and Amphetamine.

Authors:  Weize Huang; Lindsay C Czuba; Nina Isoherranen
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Hyperfiltration and uricosuria in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Petter Bjornstad; Carlos Roncal; Tamara Milagres; Laura Pyle; Miguel Angel Lanaspa; Franziska K Bishop; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Richard J Johnson; R Paul Wadwa; David M Maahs
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Method of alkalization and monitoring of urinary pH for prevention of recurrent uric acid urolithiasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Guido Maarten Kamphuis; Jons Wouter van Hattum; Prim de Bie; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

6.  Metabolic Profiling of Human Plasma and Urine, Targeting Tryptophan, Tyrosine and Branched Chain Amino Acid Pathways.

Authors:  Andrea Anesi; Josep Rubert; Kolade Oluwagbemigun; Ximena Orozco-Ruiz; Ute Nöthlings; Monique M B Breteler; Fulvio Mattivi
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-11-01

Review 7.  Review of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Normal Anion Gap Metabolic Acidosis.

Authors:  Kenrick Berend
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Optimising storage conditions and processing of sheep urine for nitrogen cycle and gaseous emission measurements from urine patches.

Authors:  Alice F Charteris; Karina A Marsden; Jess R Evans; Harry A Barrat; Nadine Loick; Davey L Jones; David R Chadwick; Laura M Cárdenas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology.

Authors:  C Rose; A Parker; B Jefferson; E Cartmell
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 12.561

10.  Urine specimen validity test for drug abuse testing in workplace and court settings.

Authors:  Shin-Yu Lin; Hei-Hwa Lee; Jong-Feng Lee; Bai-Hsiun Chen
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.