Literature DB >> 17988455

Prevalence and disposition of drugs of abuse and opioid treatment drugs in oral fluid.

Edward J Cone1, Joe Clarke, Lolita Tsanaclis.   

Abstract

Testing oral fluid for drugs of abuse has been studied under many conditions but rarely has been evaluated in large population databases. We evaluated oral fluid tests in a database from a commercial laboratory in the United Kingdom composed of 8679 confirmed positive results. The results originated from 635,000 specimens collected over the period of May 2004 through September 2006. Oral fluid specimens were collected with the Intercept oral fluid collection device, screened by enzyme immunoassay, and confirmed by GC-MS or GC-MS-MS. The database was organized by collection settings (legal/treatment, N = 8198 specimens; and workplace, N = 481 specimens) and by drug groups (without consideration of collection setting). The drug groups were as follows (number of confirmed positives): amphetamines (468); benzodiazepines (892); buprenorphine (276); cannabinoids (725); cocaine (1443); methadone (998); and opiates (5739). The goal of the study was to provide drug/metabolite prevalence data, concentrations, and drugs/metabolite patterns encountered in oral fluid. Comparison of results by collection setting indicated differences in relative frequency, primarily for opiates and cannabinoids. Opiate positives were most frequently observed for specimens collected in legal/treatment settings, whereas cannabinoids were most frequently reported in the workplace. An array of information on drug and metabolite occurrences and concentration arose from evaluation of the data by drug groups. Amphetamine was the predominant drug reported for the Amphetamines Group; approximately 10% were also positive for MDA and/or MDMA; and methamphetamine was rarely reported. Multiple combinations of diazepam, nordiazepam, oxazepam, temazepam, chlordiazepoxide, and lorazepam were reported for the Benzodiazepine Group. Buprenorphine, an opioid treatment drug, was the predominant analyte reported, but low concentrations of norbuprenorphine were frequently reported. THC was the predominant analyte reported in the Cannabinoids Group and was frequently reported in combination with cannabidiol and cannabinol. THCCOOH was reported in only 10.8% of these specimens and was never reported in the absence of THC. HO-THC was reported in 5.7% of the specimens. In the Cocaine Group, cocaine was present, often in combination with BZE, but also as the sole analyte in 17.3% of the specimens. AEME and cocaethylene were reported in 10.4% and 5.5% of the specimens. Methadone, another opioid treatment drug, was reported in all specimens for the Methadone Group; EDDP was reported in 30.1% of the specimens. In the Opiates Group, morphine, codeine and 6-acetylmorhine were most frequently reported, often in combination. The frequency of detection of 6-acetylmorphine when morphine was present (N = 4575 specimens) was 77.5%. Surprisingly, heroin (19.0%; N = 1091 specimens) and 6-acetylcodeine (24.9%; N = 1431 specimens) were frequently reported. The results from analysis of this large oral fluid database offer a rich mixture of new information on detection frequency, drug and metabolite patterns, and concentration data on drugs of abuse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17988455     DOI: 10.1093/jat/31.8.424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  13 in total

1.  Is saliva a valid substitute for plasma in pharmacokinetic studies of oxycodone and its metabolites in patients with cancer?

Authors:  Janet Hardy; Ross Norris; Helen Anderson; Angela O'Shea; Bruce Charles
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Laboratory testing for prescription opioids.

Authors:  Michael C Milone
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-12

Review 3.  Saliva diagnostics - Current views and directions.

Authors:  Karolina Elżbieta Kaczor-Urbanowicz; Carmen Martin Carreras-Presas; Katri Aro; Michael Tu; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; David Tw Wong
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-12-08

4.  Methadone disposition in oral fluid during pharmacotherapy for opioid-dependence.

Authors:  Teresa R Gray; Riet Dams; Robin E Choo; Hendree E Jones; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Simultaneous quantification of cannabinoids and metabolites in oral fluid by two-dimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Garry Milman; Allan J Barnes; Ross H Lowe; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 6.  Current knowledge on cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 3.345

Review 7.  Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Wendy M Bosker; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Oral fluid cannabinoids in chronic frequent cannabis smokers during ad libitum cannabis smoking.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Ryan Vandrey; Damodara R Mendu; Jeannie A Murray; Allan J Barnes; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.345

Review 9.  Saliva Liquid Biopsy for Point-of-Care Applications.

Authors:  Katri Aro; Fang Wei; David T Wong; Michael Tu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-04-11

10.  Experience of road and other trauma by the opiate dependent patient: a survey report.

Authors:  Albert S Reece
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2008-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.