Literature DB >> 17988439

Impact of 'living apart together' on postoperative recovery of mice compared with social and individual housing.

Pascalle L P Van Loo1, Nynke Kuin, René Sommer, Harut Avsaroglu, Therese Pham, Vera Baumans.   

Abstract

Social housing is the optimal way of housing female laboratory mice. However, individual housing may be required in experimental designs, for example after surgery. We therefore investigated whether housing two female mice in a cage, separated by a grid partition ('living apart together', LAT), counters the adverse effects of individual housing on postoperative recovery. Ten individually housed (IND) mice, nine socially housed (SOC) mice and nine mice, housed LAT, were surgically implanted with a telemetry transmitter. From one week prior to surgery until three weeks thereafter, several physiological and behavioural parameters were measured in the mice subjected to surgery. The telemetry transmitter measured heart rate (HR), body temperature and activity continuously. Body weight, food and water intake were scored regularly, as were wound healing, ease of handling, nest building and behaviour. Results indicated that SOC mice appear to be less affected by abdominal surgery than IND mice, as indicated by HR and behaviour. LAT, however, did not appear to be beneficiary to the mice. Increased HR levels and differences in behaviour as compared with both SOC and IND animals indicate that LAT may even be the most stressful of the three housing conditions. We therefore conclude that mice benefit most from social housing after surgery. If, however, social housing is not possible, individual housing appears to be a better option than separating mice by a grid partition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17988439     DOI: 10.1258/002367707782314328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  26 in total

1.  Differences in postsurgical recovery of CF1 mice after intraperitoneal implantation of radiotelemetry devices through a midline or flank surgical approach.

Authors:  Mark G Chappell; Craig A Koeller; Shannan I Hall
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Effects of experimental housing conditions on recovery of laboratory mice.

Authors:  Paulin Jirkof
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 3.  Pros and Cons of Clinically Relevant Methods to Assess Pain in Rodents.

Authors:  Anke Tappe-Theodor; Tamara King; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Introducing Therioepistemology: the study of how knowledge is gained from animal research.

Authors:  Joseph P Garner; Brianna N Gaskill; Elin M Weber; Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

5.  Aggression in group-housed laboratory mice: why can't we solve the problem?

Authors:  Elin M Weber; Jamie Ahloy Dallaire; Brianna N Gaskill; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning; Joseph P Garner
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

6.  Postsurgical food and water consumption, fecal corticosterone metabolites, and behavior assessment as noninvasive measures of pain in vasectomized BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Kirsten R Jacobsen; Otto Kalliokoski; Anne C Teilmann; Jann Hau; Klas Sp Abelson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Human Infant Pants for Postoperative Protection during Social Housing of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  Kristina A Bartley; Crystal H Johnson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Effects of buprenorphine and meloxicam analgesia on induced cerebral ischemia in C57BL/6 male mice.

Authors:  Kirsten R Jacobsen; Natasha Fauerby; Zindy Raida; Otto Kalliokoski; Jann Hau; Flemming F Johansen; Klas Sp Abelson
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.982

9.  Physiological effects of housing density on C57BL/6J mice over a 9-month period.

Authors:  B Paigen; K L Svenson; R Von Smith; M A Marion; T Stearns; L L Peters; A L Smith
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Social Housing Leads to Increased Ethanol Intake in Male Mice Housed in Environmentally Enriched Cages.

Authors:  Hannah D Fulenwider; Meridith T Robins; Maya A Caruso; Andrey E Ryabinin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.