Literature DB >> 17987981

Rights and the reality of healthcare charging in the United Kingdom.

Tom Yates1, Rosie Crane, Angela Burnett.   

Abstract

In 2004, the United Kingdom Government withdrew free access to secondary healthcare for certain groups of overseas visitors, including those asylum seekers whose claims had failed but were still living legally in the UK. We argue, as others have previously, that the implementation of the 2004 National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) (Amendment) Regulations, represents a serious breach of the right to health as envisaged in international law. This placed health care workers in an invidious position of having to identify those entitled to care. We argue that this is not the role of healthcare and that doctors must not allow the denial of healthcare to be used as a tool of immigration policy. We also question the notion that these regulations make economic sense and suggest that they will have a detrimental effect upon public health.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17987981     DOI: 10.1080/13623690701596775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Confl Surviv        ISSN: 1362-3699


  1 in total

1.  Loss to Follow-Up After Pregnancy Among Sub-Saharan Africa-Born Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: Results From a Large National Cohort.

Authors:  Shema Tariq; Jonathan Elford; Cuong Chau; Clare French; Mario Cortina-Borja; Alison Brown; Valerie Delpech; Pat A Tookey
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.830

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.