Literature DB >> 1798775

The ability of pigs to control their protein intake when fed in three different ways.

I Kyriazakis1, G C Emmans, C T Whittemore.   

Abstract

The ability of pigs to control their protein intake was tested in three different ways. When pigs were offered access to single feeds of different protein contents, at a constant liveweight of 20 kg, they increased their daily feed intake as the protein content of their feed was decreased (long-term protein intake regulation). When the protein content of their feed was altered daily, pigs consumed consistently higher amounts of feed when they had access to a low protein feed rather than to a high protein one (short-term protein intake regulation). When, finally, they were given a choice between two feeds of different protein contents, pigs selected a diet that met their protein requirements (as judged by their growth rates and feed efficiencies) and avoided excess of protein intake, but only if they had had previous experience of both feeds. It is suggested that pigs first need to learn about the feeds that are subsequently offered as a choice, before they can make correct dietary choices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1798775     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90582-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  8 in total

Review 1.  Homeostatic regulation of protein intake: in search of a mechanism.

Authors:  Christopher D Morrison; Scott D Reed; Tara M Henagan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Inadequate dietary protein increases hunger and desire to eat in younger and older men.

Authors:  John W Apolzan; Nadine S Carnell; Richard D Mattes; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Consistent proportional macronutrient intake selected by adult domestic cats (Felis catus) despite variations in macronutrient and moisture content of foods offered.

Authors:  Adrian K Hewson-Hughes; Victoria L Hewson-Hughes; Alison Colyer; Andrew T Miller; Simon R Hall; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Testing protein leverage in lean humans: a randomised controlled experimental study.

Authors:  Alison K Gosby; Arthur D Conigrave; Namson S Lau; Miguel A Iglesias; Rosemary M Hall; Susan A Jebb; Jennie Brand-Miller; Ian D Caterson; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Potential Impact of Animal Science Research on Global Maternal and Child Nutrition and Health: A Landscape Review.

Authors:  Jack Odle; Sheila K Jacobi; R Dean Boyd; Dale E Bauman; Russell V Anthony; Fuller W Bazer; Adam L Lock; Andrew C Serazin
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  Effects of feed allowance and indispensable amino acid reduction on feed intake, growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing pigs.

Authors:  Stefano Schiavon; Mirco Dalla Bona; Giuseppe Carcò; Luca Carraro; Lutz Bunger; Luigi Gallo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Balancing macronutrient intake in a mammalian carnivore: disentangling the influences of flavour and nutrition.

Authors:  Adrian K Hewson-Hughes; Alison Colyer; Stephen J Simpson; David Raubenheimer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 8.  FGF21 and the Physiological Regulation of Macronutrient Preference.

Authors:  Cristal M Hill; Emily Qualls-Creekmore; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Paul Soto; Sangho Yu; David H McDougal; Heike Münzberg; Christopher D Morrison
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.